300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

45 active trials for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BFRT vs Standard PT After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) uses a specialized tourniquet system to restrict arterial inflow and venous outflow to the limb during low-load resistance exercise. BFRT has the potential to augment strength gains for rehabilitation patients who are unable to tolerate high intensity resistance training. Objective To determine if BFRT will accelerate the recovery of thigh muscle function and strength in post-operative TKA compared to a standard post-operative rehabilitation protocol. Primary Outcome Measures: Quadriceps Strength: dynamometry (hand held) Secondary Outcomes Measures: Patient Reported Outcomes Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Jr Veterans Rand -12 Functional Measures Timed stair ascent Four square Test 5x Sit to Stand Test Study Design Open label randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation in random sized blocks Sample Size Based on a Pre-TKA Quadriceps Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction mean of 18 with a standard deviation of 8, expecting a 20% improvement of MVIC with BFRT compared to standard Physical Therapy, with an ? of 0.05 and ? of 0.20 (80% power), the sample size is 63 in each arm. To account for a 20% drop-out rate, a total of 75 subjects will be enrolled in each arm Study Arms Control arm: Subjects will receive American College of Sports Medicine guided-strength training Experimental: Subjects will receive BFRT strength training as part of their post-operative physical therapy program for two months during normal post-op rehab.

Start: March 2021
Evaluation of Two Surgical Strategies for Robotic Implantation of Total Knee Prostheses (Stryker), Cemented Versus Uncemented

Total knee replacement surgery (TKA) is a treatment for advanced tibial-femoral osteoarthritis. This intervention is justified in case of significant discomfort and failure of medical treatment. It aims to replace the native internal and external femoro-tibial joints with a joint between a femoral implant and a tibial implant. Implants can be cemented or cementless. The longevity of these implants depends among other things on the quality of the bone fixation of the implants. It is therefore essential that this fixation be evaluated. The advantages of an uncemented TKA are the preservation of bone stock, the absence of wear by cement debris and prolonged fixation thanks to osseointegration. These characteristics are all the more interesting in a young population. Numerous studies have been carried out on the survival of TKA with and without cement. The results found are not unanimous and mainly concern the survival of the implants and the presence of radiological signs of loosening. In addition, no study has evaluated the results of TKA with or without cement implanted using robotic assistance. The precision provided by the robotic system could improve the results of these uncemented implants. Very few studies are interested in the functional results according to the cementation or not of TKA. And most of these studies do not have a high level of methodological evidence. We would like to prospectively evaluate the functional results, survival, as well as the rate of radiological border after TKA with or without cement posed with robotic assistance, in the short and medium term.

Start: September 2021