In Vivo Kinematics for Subjects With Smith & Nephew Journey II BCS TKA, Journey II CR TKA, Or Journey II XR TKA
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Knee
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Type
- Observational
- Design
- Observational Model: CohortTime Perspective: Retrospective
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 85 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
The objective of this study is to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics and vibroarthrography (VAG) signals for subjects implanted with Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS), CR (Cruciate Retaining), and Bi-Cruciate Retaining (XR) TKAs. The Journey II BCS Knee System was designed to resect ...
The objective of this study is to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics and vibroarthrography (VAG) signals for subjects implanted with Journey II Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS), CR (Cruciate Retaining), and Bi-Cruciate Retaining (XR) TKAs. The Journey II BCS Knee System was designed to resect and replicate both the PCL and ACL, the Journey II CR System retains the posterior cruciate ligament, while the Journey II XR System retains the cruciate and collateral ligaments so they remain intact.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04612036
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael LaCour, PhD The University of Tennessee
Get Well Soon