300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

48 active trials for IVF

Analysis of the Composition of the Vaginal Microbiota During IVF Treatment and Correlation With Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer

The composition of the vaginal microbiota varies throughout a woman's life and is sensitive to hormonal and environmental factors. Specifically, hormonal treatments necessary in the medically assisted procreation (MAP) processes can influence the vaginal microbiota. New sequencing techniques have been used to characterize the vaginal microbiota, demonstrating that the microbiota could be divided into 5 classes. The composition of the vaginal microbiota seems to have an implication in the evolution of a pregnancy after IVF. It is therefore essential to have more data on the evolution of the vaginal microbiota at the different stages of IVF treatment and to analyze whether this evolution can be predictive of the success of embryo implantation. Good endometrial progesterone impregnation is an essential prerequisite for ensuring embryo implantation. Indeed, supporting the luteal phase through vaginal progesterone is an essential step in IVF protocols to ensure synchronization between endometrial maturation and embryonic age. However, the serum progesterone level on the day of embryo transfer varies widely between patients. Several factors such as age, vaginal mucosa trophicity, estrogen impregnation and sexual activity are known to affect the vaginal absorption of progesterone. The treatments and vaginal examinations performed during the IVF procedure could also have an impact on the constitution of the vaginal microbiota. The hypothesis of this research is that there is an alteration in the vaginal microbiota during the IVF process which may alter the absorption of vaginal progesterone, with an impact on the failure or success of embryo implantation.

Start: April 2021
Optimization of Frozen Embryo Transfers by Studying Progesterone on the Day of Transfer

The number of embryo transfers after freezing has increased over the last 10 years due to improvements in embryo freezing techniques and in particular the development of vitrification. This has also been made possible by changes in clinical protocols favouring freezing in patients at high risk of hyperstimulation and by different methods of endometrial preparation to receive embryos after rewarming. In fact, embryo transfer requires endometrial preparation to make implantation possible. There are various protocols for endometrial preparation. Endometrial preparations in the natural cycle, with or without induction of ovulation by FSH, require more regular monitoring, and allow the development of a main follicle that will give a corpus luteum that will secrete progesterone in the luteal phase, which can be supported by the supply of exogenous progesterone. In contrast, endometrial preparations in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles are done by administering estradiol orally or transdermally to stimulate endometrial growth while blocking the patient's gonadotropic axis, and administering progesterone in the luteal phase to differentiate the endometrium. This preparation has the advantage of being simpler to monitor and organize. There is currently no consensus on a type of preparation that would give better results, and although the literature seems to show that there would be more miscarriages in a substituted cycle, there does not seem to be any difference in the birth rate per cycle in the end, whatever the type of endometrial preparation. Some teams have shown that in HRT, there appears to be more miscarriage when the progesterone level measured on the day of the frozen embryo transfer is lower, especially below a threshold of 9ng/mL. Labarta showed ESHRE in July 2019 that modifying the endometrial preparation if the progesterone level is below 9ng/mL on the day of transfer by adding subcutaneous progesterone (Progiron) resulted in a lower miscarriage rate, comparable to the usual miscarriage rates in spontaneous pregnancy. Thus, if the miscarriage rate is higher in HRT than in the natural cycle, and if this is related to "luteal insufficiency" characterized by a lower circulating serum progesterone level, the hypothesis of this study in the investigator's population would be that the serum progesterone level on the day of the frozen embryo transfer would be lower in HRT than in the spontaneous cycle.

Start: March 2020
Desogestrel Versus GnRH Antagonist in IVF/ICSI

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has been shown to be effective in avoiding premature spontaneous ovulation, without affecting the number of retrieved oocytes or the quality of the embryos obtained. The utilization of progestins permits lower costs, an easier administration (oral assumption instead of injections) and a tight control over LH levels. Hence the PPOS may be a valid alternative to the standard ovarian stimulation protocols. Additionally, it may be anticipated some degree of superiority of PPOS in particular categories of patients: donors, women at risk of OHSS, women who preserve their as well as poor responder or suboptimal responders for whom oocytes/embryo accumulation or double ovarian stimulation protocols are proposed The aim of this trial will be to investigate the use of Desogestrel in controlling the LH surge during ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. This study is a noninferiority trial in which the the primary efficacy endpoint will be the number of oocytes retrieved per patient. Sample size calculation was performed with the assumptions that the non-inferiority margin is corresponding to three or less oocytes . With the objective to demonstrate that the difference in average number of oocytes retrieved between the Desogestrel and the ganirelix groups would not exceed three, the power for a comparison between the two groups would be equal to 87% for 75 evaluable patients in each treatment groups (for an allocation of 1:1 and a total sample size of 150). To allocate at least 150 patients, an additional 10% to cover possible dropping out were planned to allocate. A total of 165 patients will be included in this study Patients will be assigned to either the study or the control group. The study group will be administered follitropin alfa (Bemfola 150-225 IU/die) and Desogestrel (Cerazette 75 mcg daily ) will be started on stimulation day 7 or when the leading follicle will reach 14 mm, whichever comes first. An antagonist protocol will be used for the control group. Patients will be administered follitropin alfa (Bemfola 150 - 225 IU/die) and Ganirelix (Orgalutran 0.25 mg/die) will be started on stimulation day 7 or when the leading follicle will reach 14 mm, whichever comes first. When a diameter of 18 mm is reached, the final stage of oocyte maturation will be triggered with triptorelin 0.2 mg + hCG 1000 U s.c. Fertilization of the aspirated oocytes will be carried out in vitro, by either conventional insemination or ICSI, depending on semen parameters. Viable embryos will be then frozen by means of vitrificaton on the day in which they will reach the blastocyst developmental stage.

Start: October 2020