300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

48 active trials for IVF

Evaluating Piezo-ICSI. - The EPI Study.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has successfully been used to treat both severe male infertility and fertilization failure since its introduction in the early 1990´s. During the procedure a single sperm is injected into the cytoplasm of an oocyte to achieve fertilization. This technique is intrusive, has a relatively long learning curve and variable operator performance. A new injection technique called piezo-ICSI has recently been introduced. During piezo-ICSI, a piezo-electric effect is generated through the conversion of electric energy to mechanical energy. This causes a smooth movement of the injection pipette, which allows for steady, controlled microinjections with less psychical stress applied on the oocytes than by the conventional technique. A recent analysis, based on data from 9 different studies comparing conventional ICSI and piezo-ICSI (17500 cases), showed a benefit of piezo. Unfortunately, proper randomized trials are missing from this analysis. The proposed study is a randomized controlled study carried out at two private IVF clinics. Eligible participants are patients undergoing ICSI treatment, with a minimum of 6 oocytes. The participants will act as their own controls, with their oocytes randomly and equally divided between injection by the investigated and the conventional technique. Whether piezo-ICSI is associated with improved success rates or reduction in adverse outcomes is at present unclear. Patients with fragile oocytes may benefit more from piezo-ICSI. In patients above 35 years, piezo-ICSI has been associated with a lower oocyte degeneration rate and an increased blastocyst rate. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the piezo-ICSI technique will result in more oocytes becoming normally fertilized compared to conventional ICSI. Another proposed benefit of piezo-ICSI lies in the standardization and simplification of the ICSI procedure. Making the injection procedure more independent of operator skill may result in a more robust and predictable laboratory output.

Start: March 2021
The LUTEAL Trial: Luteal Stimulation vs. Estrogen Priming Protocol

Ovarian reserve defines the quantity and quality of the ovarian primordial follicular pool. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) indicates a reduction in the quantity of ovarian follicular pool to less than expected for age. It is an important cause of infertility in many couples. To date, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the definition of diminished ovarian reserve, and it is unclear whether low oocyte yield results from an abnormal atresia rate of the follicle pool, or from a lower follicle pool at birth or whether it can just occur as a normal variation in the population. The ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (for example, for in vitro fertilization) is largely determined by the ovarian reserve, and there are numerous different ovarian stimulation protocols that are employed to try and increase the oocyte yield of a particular cycle. There is no consensus on which, if any, of these protocols are superior and preferred for patient with DOR. Luteal gonadotropin stimulation is a protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for use in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that has emerged over the past decade as an acceptable alternative to the classic follicular gonadotropin stimulation. The luteal estradiol patch protocol was introduced in 2005 in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and to address the phenomenon of early follicle recruitment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Luteal gonadotropin stimulation can potentially achieve the same effect by initiating follicular recruitment for IVF prior to the body's own premature recruitment. Our hypothesis is that the luteal stimulation protocol and estradiol priming protocol are equivalent with regard to the outcome of number of mature oocytes retrieved. Patients who will be undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and who have a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve will be considered for this trial, and enrolled if meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria.

Start: September 2020
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Follicular Fluid and Cumulus-oocyte-complexes in COVID-19 Patients

Recently, the world was shaken awake by a pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). In most nations drastic isolation measures were taken to minimize the further spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Being the first pandemic sparked by a Coronavirus, little was known on COVID-19 and its implications on general health. Our understanding on the virus and its potential effects on health is growing. In Belgium, the situation is stabilizing, and doctors and healthcare workers are slowly recommencing routine work and consultations. As also fertility treatments were abruptly interrupted, many patients are in need to resume their treatment. The limited evidence of SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy seems to be rather satisfying1, but practically nothing is known about the possible impact of an active SARS-CoV-2 infection on female gametes. Viral transmission occurs predominantly through respiratory droplets, but transmission to gametes cannot be ruled out. Since the onset of the pandemic, knowledge about the molecular details of SARS-CoV-2 infection rapidly grew. Coronaviruses are enveloped RNA viruses. For a virus to deliver their genome into the host cell, attachment and entrance into that cell is a crucial step. The coronavirus surface protein spike (S) mediates entry into target cells by binding to a cellular receptor and subsequent fusing of the viral envelope with a host cell membrane. The SARS-CoV-2-S protein (SARS-S) utilizes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a receptor for host cell entry. Host proteases such as transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) are then needed to cleave the viral S protein, allow-ing permanent fusion of the viral and host cell membranes2. Expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 has been shown in testicular, uterine and placental cells. Based on available transcriptomic data, co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 is also seen on oocyte level, but the possible impact on reproduction is unknown. The BSG (basigin or CD147), a receptor on host cells, was also identified as a possible route for viral invasion.

Start: June 2020