300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

231 active trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

An Implementation Trial to Improve Access to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With COPD

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience distressing breathlessness and high health care utilisation. There is compelling evidence that pulmonary rehabilitation improves symptoms and reduces hospitalisation, but is delivered to <10% of patients who would benefit. The investigators developed a low cost model of pulmonary rehabilitation that can be delivered entirely at home. The HomeBase model had equivalent outcomes to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a phase II efficacy trial, with higher completion rates. The investigators hypothesise that a patient centred model offering a choice between home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation may increase program completion rates, with improved outcomes for patients and the health system. This is a cluster randomised implementation trial investigating whether offering a choice of home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation can reduce hospitalisation, improve pulmonary rehabilitation completion and enhance patient outcomes in people with COPD. 14 pulmonary rehabilitation programs located across Australia will each recruit 35 people with COPD. Intervention centres: People with COPD will be offered the choice of centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation or the HomeBase model. Comparison centres: Only the existing centre-based model will be offered. The primary outcome is all cause, non-elective hospitalisation at 12 months. Other outcomes are symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life at 8 weeks and 12 months; and health care costs at 12 months for full economic evaluation.

Start: March 2021
HomeVent ( Connect) Registry: EU COPD Home NIV Registry

The prevalence of chronic respiratory disease, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is increasing in industrialized countries. Over the next decade deaths from COPD are projected to increase by more than 30% and COPD will become the third leading cause of death worldwide by 2030. There is robust scientific evidence that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy is an effective option for most COPD patients hospitalized with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to an acute disease exacerbation. More recently, NIV has been shown to significantly improve survival and quality of life in COPD patients with chronic stable hypercapnic disease. These data represent an important advance in the field, and indicate that usage of NIV in patients with chronic stable hypercapnic COPD should increase. Such an increase would be expected to improve patient outcomes and have a beneficial impact on the significant healthcare burden incurred by these patients. However, the proportion of stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnia is unknown. In addition, using NIV at home to treat COPD patients with hypercapnic (type 2) respiratory failure has not often been considered previously and there is a paucity of data regarding NIV usage patterns over time in this setting. Phase2: There is robust scientific evidence that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy is an effective option for most COPD patients hospitalised with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to an acute disease exacerbation [3]. More recently, NIV has been shown to significantly improve survival and quality of life in COPD patients with chronic stable hypercapnic disease [4] and in patients with persistent hypercapnia after an acute chronic respiratory failure [11]. Over the past two decades, the utilisation of NIV has become one of the most important developments in the field of mechanical ventilation. However, unsuccessful NIV was found to be independently associated with death [5] and poor NIV compliance was associated with higher risk of repeat acute NIV use [6]. There is a paucity of useful predictors of poor patient compliance and the performance of conventional algorithms for detecting COPD exacerbations is still weak. Detection of NIV failure is crucial in patient management in view of its negative effect on quality of life and prognosis and the fact that it often leads to hospitalisation. In addition, 70% of COPD-related healthcare costs are consequences of emergency and hospital stays for the treatment of exacerbations [7]. Recently, tele-monitoring emerged and unfolded differently among various healthcare organisations and countries. Evidence regarding its impact on the management of COPD patients is still insufficient to draw firm conclusions. Assumption has been made that remote monitoring of home NIV treatment could help to identify novel predictors of the early detection of NIV failure and deteriorations in patients with COPD. The incidence in routine clinical care of unplanned all-cause and COPD-caused hospitalisations in patients treated with NIV therapy who are continuously monitored by telemetric data in several European countries needs evaluation. In addition, predictors of unplanned all-cause and COPD-caused hospitalisations as well as of compliance and persistence to NIV therapy should be assessed in this patient population with special respect to continuous tele-monitoring

Start: July 2016
PCORI Integrated Care (IC) Models for Patient-Centered Outcomes

Multiple chronic conditions (MCC) are widely recognized as the U.S. public health challenge of the 21st century. These physical and behavioral health conditions take a large toll on those suffering from the diseases, including many who are publicly insured, as well as caregivers and society. While evidence-based integrated care models can improve outcomes for individuals with MCC, such models have not yet been widely implemented. Insurance providers/payers have innovative system features that can be used to deploy these models; however, the investigators do not yet know which of these features can best help to improve outcomes for individuals with MCC in general or high-need subgroups in particular. As a result, patients lack information to make important decisions about their health and health care, and system-level decision makers face ongoing challenges in effectively and efficiently supporting those with MCC. This real-world study will provide useful information about available options for supporting individuals with MCC. Building on existing integrated care efforts, the investigators will enroll N=1,927 (N=265 Phase I and N=1,662 Phase II) adults with MCC at risk for repeated hospitalizations and assess the impact of three payer-led options (e.g. High-Touch, High-Tech, Usual Care) on patient-centered outcomes, namely patient activation in health care, health status, and subsequent re-hospitalization. The investigators will also determine which option works best for whom under what circumstances by gathering information directly from individuals with MCC through self-report questionnaires, health care use data, and interviews.

Start: April 2018
Influence of Reliance on Historical Blood Eosinophil Counts on ICS Prescribing by GOLD 2019 Thresholds in COPD

Blood eosinophils are a type of white blood cell that helps fight infection. They have a number of different functions but are primarily involved in numerous inflammatory processes. They are recruited from the blood into sites of inflammation. In patients with COPD, higher blood eosinophil count (BEC) predicts a greater reduction in moderate and severe exacerbations in response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy (GOLD 2019) recommends the use of BEC to guide ICS therapy and states that eosinophil levels above 300 cells/?L can help identify responders, guiding initial dual therapy, with "little or no effect at a BEC < 100 cells/?L". The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) COPD 2018 guideline states that a higher BEC is associated with ICS response, but does not specify a threshold. Earlier research studies have suggested that at lower levels of BEC the harm of ICS due to pneumonia is greater than the benefit of severe exacerbation reduction. Patients with COPD can have "flare ups" of their disease known as exacerbations. Blood eosinophils play a critical role in assessing severity of these exacerbations and guiding management. The association between BEC and reduction in exacerbation frequency is based on BEC measured when the patient is clinically stable. Transient low eosinophil count (eosinopenia with BEC < 50 cells/?L) during severe exacerbation is extremely common. In the Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score derivation and validation studies combined, eosinopenia was present on admission in 1,340 of 2,645 severe exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) and is associated with longer length of stay, higher in-hospital and one year mortality. Although eosinophilic COPD exacerbations occur, overall BEC during moderate or severe exacerbation is lower than stable state. In ECOPD managed in critical care low BEC is associated with higher rate of septic shock and mortality. BEC are also suppressed during other acute illnesses, notably sepsis. Failure to recognise that BEC are often suppressed during acute illness compared to stable state may lead to ICS therapy being inappropriately withheld. The effect of exacerbation and other acute illnesses on eosinophils is under-appreciated. Both NICE and GOLD guidelines fail to mention whether BEC should be prospectively measured when patients are stable (reflecting RCT evidence), or if reliance on historical values is acceptable. In routine practice some clinicians rely on previous BECs to avoid a delay in treatment decisions. A number of these historical counts will have been taken during illness, underestimating the patients' stable-state BEC. Conversely, COPD is associated with other medical conditions, and BEC may be requested for reasons other than acute illness. Using the highest BEC from multiple measures in the previous 24 months may therefore better agree with stable state counts. The primary aim of this trial is to assess the reliability of using BEC over the preceding 24 months to assess COPD eosinophil phenotype at both GOLD thresholds. The primary outcome will be based on using the highest of at least three BEC. Secondary outcomes include a) the level of agreement between baseline stable state BEC and both mean and the highest BEC over the preceding 24 months, b) the influence of the number of BEC measures available and c) the effect of limiting the time frame from 24 months to the previous 12 months. BEC is associated with disease severity, providing further evidence that COPD eosinophil phenotype may change over time. As an exploratory analysis, periods of sustained change in eosinophil phenotype will be sought, and the relationship between eosinophil phenotype and patient characteristics and certain medication will be assessed. The investigators will also assess the relations between the dependent variables stable state absolute eosinophil and basophil counts and both eosinophil to basophil and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios and the following clinical outcomes: a) moderate and severe exacerbations and b) mortality. Some of these variables have previously been shown to be related to disease severity and mortality.

Start: October 2020
Efficacy of Morphine in Reducing the Rate of Early Non-Invasive Ventilation Failure in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Phase I/IIa

Acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients and cost to the society. In case of acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia and acidosis, Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is preferred as a first line treatment. NIV failures are not uncommon, from 15% in intensive care to 25 - 30% in emergency departments. They most often occur at the start of the NIV or in the hours that follow. There are many reasons for these failure. Among these are; dyspnea, discomfort, the pain related to the exacerbation and also to the NIV are frequently noted. The use of certain drugs with anxiolytic, hypnotic and/or analgesic properties could also be useful. Some sedatives and opioids have already been studied in this indication but without a therapeutic trial and satisfactory methodology. Among the molecules of interest, Morphine seems interesting . It's administration could reduce the ventilatory rate, intensity of dyspnea, pain and anxiety as well as dynamic hyperinflation. The investigators believe that morphine administration will decrease the rate of early NIV failure by improving comfort (decreased dyspnea and pain) and ventilation (decreased respiratory rate and increase in tidal volume) in patients with exacerbations of COPD. However, before considering a randomized phase III efficacy study, it is necessary to determine the optimal dose of morphine in this indication, through a phase I/II dose-finding study taking into accounts both the efficacy and toxicity of morphine. The main objective of this study, is to determine the optimal dose of morphine administered at the initiation of NIV in patient with acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is defined as the maximum gain function combining the probability of dose-limiting toxicity with PaCO2.Therefore, the impact of morphine administration on the physiological parameters of NIV- COPD exacerbation patients will be assessed.

Start: December 2020