300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

32 active trials for Cardiac Arrhythmia

Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy on Arrhythmias

The study focuses on patients who have already been diagnosed with an arrhythmia. This is a randomized control trial that will use measurements from the implanted devices to quantify changes in the number of cardiac events experienced. Subjects will present to the Long Island Heart Rhythm Clinic (LIHRC) at the New York Institute of Technology (NYIT) Academic Health Care Center for their scheduled appointment with Dr. Cohen. These patients are generally coming in for their electrophysiology cardiology checkup, postsurgical visit, or consultation concerning their cardiac health. Once confirmed the patients meet the inclusion criteria, they will be informed about this proposed study and asked if they would like to participate. They will then be consented and randomized according to the randomization procedure outlined below. Once enrolled, the patients will complete the study as outlined in the procedures below. They will have a baseline EKG taken, and then proceed to either Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) treatment or control somatic dysfunction (SD) evaluation. The investigators will then analyze the CareLink data, or the web-based management service for the respective device, to quantify the effects the OMM or control SD evaluation had on any arrhythmia events. All investigators delivering OMM will be neuromuscular medicine/osteopathic manipulative medicine (NMM/OMM) board certified attending physicians and trained in the specific techniques that have been associated with arrhythmia SDs and treatment modalities to have consistency when treating subjects. Subject confidentiality will be maintained throughout the process as delineated in Question 5 of the protocol document.

Start: June 2019
High Radiofrequency Power for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Veins Isolation - a Pilot Observational Study.

The POWER FAST I pilot study is a unicentric, observational, non-randomized controlled clinical study. In the control group pulmonary veins isolation was performded in consecutive patients with irrigated radiofrequency cateters without contact force-sensing capabilities and using conventional low-power and long-duration radiofrequency parameters (20-30 W, 30-60 s) under continuous intracardiac-echo image and esophageal temperature monitoring. The study group consist of consecutive patients distributed in three succesive subgroups. In the study group radiofrequency ablation was performed using a point-by-point technique with contact-force catheters with different high-power and short-duration parameters: Subgroup 50W: power 50 W, application duration ? 30 s, target lesion index: LSI ? 5 or Ablation Index ? 350 (posterior wall) or ?400 (anterior wall). Subgroup 60W: power 60 W, application duration 7-10 s, contact force ?5 g. Subgroup 70W: power 70 W, application duration 9 s, contact force ?5 g. The safety endpoint was evaluated with systematic esophageal endoscopy performed <72 h after the index procedure. The efficacy endpoint was evaluated: during the ablation procedure: acute procedural efficacy, firts-pass isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins, total radiofrequency and procedural time, acute reconnections and dormant conduction, during the follow-up: any atrial tachycardias documented and longer than 30 s were considered recurrences.

Start: September 2017