300,000+ clinical trials. Find the right one.

190 active trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Electronic Feedback for Data Restitution and Valorization to the Emergency Teams in Aquitaine.

ST+ Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs in Europe and France. Emergency trans-luminal angioplasty (TLA), the gold standard treatment, is the major determinant of vital prognosis and functional recovery of patients with ST+ ACS. However, data from surveys and French practice registers highlight frequent deviations from the recommendations at different stages of the procedure; in the pre-hospital phase these malfunctions result in longer delays. Improving the quality of care for patients with ST+ ACS, and in particular improving compliance with recommended delays in the acute phase, is a public health priority in France. Feedback has been identified as one of the most effective interventions to improve practices and organisations in healthcare institutions. Feedbacks are defined as "any summary of a care performance over a given period of time that can be transmitted a posteriori to the health professional in any form, whether written, oral or by computer (in this case called e-feedbacks)". Feedbacks, by objectifying the level of individual and collective performance, encourage recipients to modify their practices and organisations to improve their performance. It also acts as a social pressure mechanism. While the minimum elements of feedback have been identified in the literature, there is a lack of information about the optimal operational modalities for their deployment, which limits the system's capacity to implement them. To overcome this lack of information, there is a consensus in the scientific community that research on feedback should focus not only on analysing its effectiveness, but above all on the determinants of its effectiveness. With regard to the quality of management of patients with ST+ ACS, only four trials were found in the literature that studied the effectiveness of feedbacks; none of them defined the optimal intervention for deploying feedbacks in the emergency department setting. Practice registers, particularly in the cardiovascular field, have shown their effectiveness in improving practices, particularly through the implementation of feedback to practitioners, who produce data. In 2012, the ARS Aquitaine set up two regional cardiovascular registers constituting permanent, nominative, continuous and exhaustive records of the management of patients suffering from coronary pathologies: the Aquitaine Interventional Cardiology Register (ACIRA) and the Aquitaine Register of Initial Management of Myocardial Infarction (REANIM). The cross-referencing of the REANIM and ACIRA registers constitutes an exhaustive cohort of patients with ST+ ACS containing information on the management of the entire care pathway, from the onset of symptoms to the end of the hospitalization for the management of the acute episode. This cohort, which is unique in France in the field of coronary pathologies, makes it possible to produce unprecedented and highly accurate information, particularly concerning the time taken to provide care. Wishing to actively engage in a process of changing practices, the Aquitaine Cardiovascular Registries team has developed an e-feedback tool for emergency, EMS and cardiology teams. This tool alone cannot contribute to effectively improving patient care. It is necessary to build an intervention for the deployment of this tool that takes into account the scientific data and the organisational constraints of care. Secondly, the evaluation of the effectiveness and economic impact of this e-feedbacks tool deployment intervention will allow us to know its real added value on practices, organisations and health care expenditure.

Start: September 2022
What is the Optimal Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome Having Atrial Fibrillation With Indication for Anticoagulants?

The optimal antithrombotic management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Patients with AF are treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or those who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e. aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel), to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF undergoing PCI were traditionally treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT, i.e. oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) to prevent ischemic complications. However, TAT doubles or even triples the risk of major bleeding complications. More recently, several clinical studies demonstrated that omitting aspirin, a strategy known as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is safer compared to TAT with comparable efficacy. However, pooled evidence from recent meta-analyses suggests that patients treated with DAT are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST) and even cardiovascular (CV) death. Insights from the AUGUSTUS trial showed that aspirin added to OAC and clopidogrel for 30 days, but not thereafter, resulted in fewer severe ischemic events. This finding emphasizes the relevance of early aspirin administration on ischemic benefit, also reflected in the current ESC guideline. However, because we consider the bleeding risk of TAT unacceptably high, we propose to use a short course of DAPT (drop the OAC for 1 month). There is evidence from the BRIDGE study that a short period of omitting OAC is safe in patients with AF. In this study, these patients are treated with DAPT that also prevents stroke, albeit not as effective as OAC. Thus, by omitting OAC in the first month, we make room for aspirin use for optimal prevention of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis in the first month after ACS or PCI. The WOEST 3 trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of one month DAPT compared to standard therapy consisting of OAC and P2Y12 inhibitor combined with aspirin up to 30 days. We hypothesise that the use of short course DAPT is superior in bleeding and, secondary, non-inferior in preventing ischemic events. The primary endpoint is clinically relevant bleeding (according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition) after one month. Secondary endpoints include a composite of CV death, MI, ischemic stroke, ST, and systemic embolism after one month, and one year follow-up.

Start: July 2022
Prediction and Validation of Clinical Course of Coronary Artery Disease With CT-Derived Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Phenotyping and Plaque Characterization

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and sudden cardiac death can be the first manifestation of coronary artery disease and are the leading cause of death in the majority of the world's population. The main pathophysiology of ACS is well-known and fibrous cap thickness, presence of a lipid core, and the degree of inflammation have been proposed as the key determinants of plaque vulnerability. Previous studies using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography showed that clinical application of this concept improved risk prediction of ACS. However, these approaches have not been widely adopted in daily practice due to relatively low positive predictive values, low prevalence of high-risk plaques and the invasive nature of diagnostic modalities. Non-invasive imaging studies with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) also showed the clinical value of CCTA-derived high risk plaque characteristics (HRPC). In addition, the recent progress in CCTA and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technologies enables simultaneous assessment of anatomical lesion severity, presence of HRPC and quantification of hemodynamic forces acting on plaques in patient-specific geometric models. As plaque rupture is a complicated biomechanical process influenced by the structure and constituents of the plaque as well as the external mechanical and hemodynamic forces acting on the plaque, a comprehensive evaluation of lesion geometry, plaque characteristics and hemodynamic parameters may enhance the identification of high-risk plaque and the prediction of ACS risk. In this regard, the current study is designed to evaluate prognostic implications of comprehensive non-invasive hemodynamic assessment using CCTA and CFD in the identification of high risk plaques that caused subsequent ACS.

Start: April 2020