Choice of Diction's Effect
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Advance Directives
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Communication
- Decision Making
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 65 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Most Americans express a preference for dying at home naturally and surrounded by loved ones. However, many also believe that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is more effective than it is, and want to have CPR even when the chances for a good outcome is poor. Among other reasons, the alternative ...
Most Americans express a preference for dying at home naturally and surrounded by loved ones. However, many also believe that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is more effective than it is, and want to have CPR even when the chances for a good outcome is poor. Among other reasons, the alternative term (Do Not Resuscitate, or DNR) has been shown in the literature to be associated by patients with passive, sub-optimal, and low quality care. This study will attempt to determine patient preference for the "no CPR" term on patients admitted to the hospital using alternate phrasing. Within 24 hours of admission to the Medical Teaching Service, patients over the age of 65 who are able to consent and who are not critically ill/unstable will be consented. After checking brief background questions (such as if they ever had discussions like these before), they will be randomized into two groups and asked code status using one of the two phrases. This question will determine the patient's "code status;" asking for this is a routine part of hospitalized care that is required by law (the exact terminology is left to the care team). After determining the patient's code status, they will be asked how satisfied they were with the decision; the investigator will be asked if they agree with the decision separately. Demographic and clinical information will be collected. Six months later, the patient will be contacted again; at this time, they will be asked about recent life and health changes. Finally, they will be asked their code status one more time. This will conclude the participant's involvement in the study
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04896411
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karthik Kota, MD MPH Advanced Endoscopy Research, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Rutgers University