Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
  • Pancreatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma
  • Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma
  • Pancreatic Carcinoma
  • Resectable Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma
  • Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
  • Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage II Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Resectable Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma
  • Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma
  • Stage 0 Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage I Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
  • Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8
Type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Double (Participant, Investigator)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the relapse-free survival (RFS)-benefit from the addition of a maintenance olaparib following completion of chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. ...

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the relapse-free survival (RFS)-benefit from the addition of a maintenance olaparib following completion of chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma and a pathogenic germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate RFS in patients with olaparib after perioperative chemotherapy compared to those treated with perioperative therapy alone among patients who received prior platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy. II. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients treated with olaparib after adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those treated with adjuvant treatment alone. III. To analyze the efficacy of olaparib after chemotherapy in patients with a pathogenic germline BRCA or PALB2 mutation compared to those with a somatic mutation. IV. To analyze survival differences between patients who received neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy compared to those who received adjuvant therapy alone. V. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those who received =< 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy compared to those who received > 3 months of perioperative platinum chemotherapy. VI. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those who received any platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy compared to no-platinum based perioperative chemotherapy. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To analyze RFS and OS differences in patients who had R1 versus (vs) R0 resections, lymph node positivity at resection, and/or elevated or rising CA 19-9 or CEA at time of study enrollment in the post-operative setting. II. To analyze RFS and OS differences with those who had resectable disease at diagnosis compared to those who did not. III. To analyze RFS and OS differences in those with gBRCA1 mutations compared to those with gBRCA2 mutations and gPALB2 mutations. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive olaparib orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO BID on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 4 months for year 1, then every 6 months for years 2-10.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04858334
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Kim A Reiss Binder ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group