Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Younger than 125 years
- Gender
- Only males
Description
According to Cochrane group trials , abdominal approaches centered on sacral colpopexy is associated with lower risk of awareness of prolapse, repeat surgery for prolapse and dyspareunia than a variety of vaginal interventions. However, these trials weren't statistically significant and have focused...
According to Cochrane group trials , abdominal approaches centered on sacral colpopexy is associated with lower risk of awareness of prolapse, repeat surgery for prolapse and dyspareunia than a variety of vaginal interventions. However, these trials weren't statistically significant and have focused on the effects in terms of anatomy and lacked the effect on functional outcomes, the quality of life, perioperative complications and the operative duration. In this study, We hypothesize that prolonged operative duration will be associated with a greater risk of developing complications and so may guide us to a minimally invasive approach with better functional outcomes.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04850365
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Asmaa Ragab Mady Ain Shams University
Get Well Soon