Efficacy and Safety of EUS-guided Coil Combined With Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection Versus BRTO in Patients With Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Gastric Varix
- Liver Cirrhosis
- Portal Hypertension
- Portosystemic Shunt
- Type
- Observational
- Design
- Observational Model: CohortTime Perspective: Retrospective
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Because the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and BRTO in the treatment of GV with SPSS have different conclusions in different studies. Investigators based on that the five-day rebleeding rate of EUS-guided coil embolization combine...
Because the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and BRTO in the treatment of GV with SPSS have different conclusions in different studies. Investigators based on that the five-day rebleeding rate of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection is 7%, BRTO is 10%. The number of people in the two groups are equal, significant level (?) is 0.05, and the test power is 0.8. Each group requires 35 patients. Because of the 10% loss to follow-up, the sample capacity is 39.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04828369
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: Mingkai Chen, PHD Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Get Well Soon