Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Single (Participant)Masking Description: The study is a participant-blinded trial and deliberate action, utilizing a physical barrier, will be taken to ensure the blind remains intact.Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 21 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with chronic axial low back pain that originates in the lumbar facet joints undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion in the medial branch nerves with either Cooled Radiof...
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with chronic axial low back pain that originates in the lumbar facet joints undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion in the medial branch nerves with either Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) or Conventional (Standard) Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA). Approximately 188 participants from approximately 15 sites will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or SRFA in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-treatment, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04803149
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Provenzano Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Get Well Soon