Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
Diabetes
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: N/AIntervention Model: Single Group AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Other

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 65 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an emerging field for diabetes management. CGMs allow providers to individualize therapy by looking at real time glucose levels, detect changes in glucose and raise awareness for hypo- and hyperglycemic events.[1] Some CGMs can be placed on the patient's arm to...

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an emerging field for diabetes management. CGMs allow providers to individualize therapy by looking at real time glucose levels, detect changes in glucose and raise awareness for hypo- and hyperglycemic events.[1] Some CGMs can be placed on the patient's arm to monitor glucose at regular intervals. The data is downloaded onto a reader where it can be viewed or sent to a computer for more in depth analysis. There are multiple Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved CGM devices. The FDA considers a device to be accurate if 99% of glucose measurements are within 20% of lab results and if 95% of glucose measurements are within 15% of lab results.[2] The accuracy and precision of CGMs is improving with increased use and advancement of the systems in use. CGM data has been deemed accurate for self use to adjust insulin dosage, detection of hypoglycemia and determining the clinical response to therapy.[3] However, CGMs are a new technology and while they have vastly improved since they originally came to market, there are still many concerns over their accuracy and ability to inform clinical treatment decisions.[3] An analysis conducted on the reports to the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database since 2015 revealed over 25,000 complaints of CGM inaccuracy.[4] In the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2020 Guidelines on the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, it is stated that glycemic goals are achieved through glucose monitoring and, as such, self monitoring blood glucose is essential for reaching these goals.[5] CGMs are used to guide the treatment of diabetes including pharmacologic intervention, recommendations for hypoglycemia prevention and nutrition goals. The recommended time spent in range, time above range and time below range are also outlined in these guidelines.[5] The significance of time below range is associated with the risk of hypoglycemia. The more time spent below range is going to increase the chance of experiencing a hypoglycemic event which, if experienced, will have both negative physical and psychological effects on the person. In the most severe cases it can also lead to seizures, coma and death.[5] Increased time spent above range has been directly correlated with incidence and progression of microvascular complications associated with diabetes like retinopathy, neuropathy and kidney disease.[5] Time spent in range is also significant because in addition to informing treatment decisions, it has also been correlated to improvements in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). In a recent analysis of 18 studies reporting paired HbA1c and time in range (%), it was found that for every 10% change in time in range, there was a corresponding 0.8% change in HbA1c.[6] This could mean that if a person spends 10% more time in range, their HbA1c may reduce up to 0.8%. This is significant since HbA1c is a gold standard marker of glycemic control in the diabetic population.[5] Based on previous studies, the evaluation of CGM readings in the left and right arms of diabetic patients is needed. The information provided by CGMs outside of glucose levels such as time range information, hyper- or hypoglycemic glucose levels, and even immediate phone alerts for very low or very high readings in newer devices highlights the ever growing and critical role these devices play in the care of diabetic patients, and as such their accuracy and proper use is of the utmost importance.[7] Cinnamon and aloe vera supplements are available over the counter and are used by consumers for many different ailments. Both cinnamon and aloe vera have been used for several centuries across many different cultures for a wide range of medicinal purposes. Diabetes is an example of one of the disease states commonly targeted by these two supplements. Patients with diabetes frequently consume cinnamon and aloe vera dietary supplements in an effort to improve their glycemic control. As research into the effects of these supplements has expanded, the understanding of their safety and practical uses has become better understood and is generally accepted.[8,9] There are many dietary supplements or food classified cinnamon and aloe vera based products on the market. Both cinnamon and aloe vera are Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS status). However there is a lack of long term evaluation of the effects of these supplements in the diabetic patient population. This study is a controlled, prospective trial that aims to evaluate the difference in glucose readings between the right arm and left arm using continuous glucose monitors in diabetic patients. In addition this study aims to evaluate the effect of cinnamon and aloe vera supplementation on glycemic control in diabetic patients.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04790760
Collaborators
Manshadi Heart Institute, Inc.
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Sachin Shah, PharmD University of the Pacific