Improving Health Equity for COVID-19 Vaccination for At-risk Populations Using Online Social Networks
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Contraception Behavior
- COVID-19
- Heart Diseases
- Vaccination Refusal
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Factorial AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Basic Science
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
To investigate the causal effects of network structure and composition on the acceptance of new or unfamiliar behavior-relevant health information, the investigators propose a randomized controlled experiment that compares several independent populations to identify and address participants' endorse...
To investigate the causal effects of network structure and composition on the acceptance of new or unfamiliar behavior-relevant health information, the investigators propose a randomized controlled experiment that compares several independent populations to identify and address participants' endorsement of biased information, and engagement with novel behavior relevant information (e.g., regarding COVID-19 vaccination). Each population will have its own network structure (i.e., level of centralization) and composition (i.e., level of homophily). To run each experimental trial, the investigators will recruit 240 African American participants, aged 18 to 40, collectively to answer behavior-relevant questions over a period of no greater than 8 minutes. Participants can respond asynchronously - i.e., when the participants' time permits. As with previous studies, the technical infrastructure will manage participants' progress through the study to ensure that all participants have the relevant information about each other's responses. To ensure causal identification, each network graph will constitute a single observation of how individual decisions change under conditions of interdependent social information. Thus, each trial of 240 people (6 networks x 40 participants per network) produces 6 observations of a community-level social learning process. Power calculations indicate that 8 independent trials are sufficient to produce results of p<0.05 with 85% power, resulting in a desired population of 1920 participants for each health topic (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination is a single "health topic"), producing 48 independent observations of collective decision making per health topic. The studies will target health topics for which there is substantial racial disparity in outcomes and behavior, such as acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination, and spreading of various categories of COVID-19 misinformation (e.g. beliefs related to assessment of personal risk, effectiveness of protective behaviors, methods of transmission, disease prevention, treatment, origins of the virus) and related health practices (e.g. choice of appropriate contraceptive methods, value of heart disease screenings, etc.).
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04779827
- Collaborators
- University of California, Davis
- University of California, San Francisco
- University of California, Berkeley
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Damon Centola, PhD University of Pennsylvania