Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
Sleep
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: Non-RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Within subject comparison of nap/overnight and wake/overnight conditions in habitual and non-habitual nappersMasking: None (Open Label)Masking Description: Within-subject; participants/experimenters are aware of conditionsPrimary Purpose: Basic Science

Participation Requirements

Age
Younger than 3371 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

With time spent awake, sleepiness increases (i.e., sleep pressure; Borbely, 1982). In young adults, naps following sleep deprivation have significantly elevated slow wave activity (SWA; 1-4 Hz) relative to naps following normal overnight sleep (Werth et al., 1996). Similarly in preschool children, o...

With time spent awake, sleepiness increases (i.e., sleep pressure; Borbely, 1982). In young adults, naps following sleep deprivation have significantly elevated slow wave activity (SWA; 1-4 Hz) relative to naps following normal overnight sleep (Werth et al., 1996). Similarly in preschool children, overnight sleep following nap deprivation yields significantly greater SWS relative to when a nap was taken earlier in the day (Lassonde et al., 2016). This impact on subsequent sleep physiology suggests that naps may be an extension of overnight sleep. How napping status (i.e., habitual and non-habitual napping) impacts overnight sleep physiology and subsequent memory consolidation is unknown. Thus, this study aims to investigate how napping vs. staying awake in habitual and non-habitual napping children may impact overnight sleep physiology and subsequent memory consolidation.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04758663
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Rebecca M Spencer, PhD University of Massachusetts, Amherst