COMPARISON OF PURSE-STRING CLOSURE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PRIMARY CLOSURE FOLLOWING STOMA REVERSAL TO REDUCE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATE"
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Difference in Surgical Site Infection According to Gender and Age Groups
- Surgical Site Infection
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: randomised control trial of two armsMasking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Prevention
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 20 years and 80 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
The study will be carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital. It will be a randomized control trial. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients will be cal...
The study will be carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital. It will be a randomized control trial. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients will be called for follow-up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups will be checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data will be statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square will also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ?0.05 will be considered as significant.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04757623
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Not Provided
Get Well Soon