Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Sedation
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 65 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Awake intubation is one of the best strategy guaranteed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines for the management of patients with anticipated difficult airways. Hemodynamic stability, optimal intubating conditions, patients' comfort, amnesia and preservation of patents' spont...
Awake intubation is one of the best strategy guaranteed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines for the management of patients with anticipated difficult airways. Hemodynamic stability, optimal intubating conditions, patients' comfort, amnesia and preservation of patents' spontaneous respiration are critical for awake intubation. Sedation is one of the key elements for this technique. Intravenous midazolam, propofol, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are commonly used as sedatives during awake intubation. These agents are not preferred to be used alone but in combination with each other for the purpose of minimizing their respective side effects. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation during awake endotracheal intubation when they are both combined with midazolam and remifentanil.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04753515
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: SanQing Jin, MD the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Get Well Soon