Vernakalant Versus Amiodarone for Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Patients

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Background - Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia post cardiac surgery. Estimates suggest that rates of patients experiencing post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery exceeds 30%. Atrial fibrillation has multiple effects on the cardiopulmonary hemodyn...

Background - Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia post cardiac surgery. Estimates suggest that rates of patients experiencing post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery exceeds 30%. Atrial fibrillation has multiple effects on the cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. Rapid irregular ventricular rate results in decreased coronary flow diminishing the ability to preserve myocardial oxygen demand leading to ischemia. Atrial contraction provides 15-20% of LV filling in normal cardiac physiology and loss of synchronized atrial contraction in addition to decreased diastolic filling time may lead to decreased cardiac. This may lead to hypotension and diminished end organ perfusion requiring additional vasoactive support. Currently amiodarone is utilized as the pharmacological agent of choice for POAF in cardiac surgery, typical rate control agents are contraindicated due to need of vasoactive requirements. However direct effects of IV amiodarone include vasodilation and hypotension typically requiring escalating doses of vasoactive medications, which subsequently prolong stay in the CVICU (cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit), increase exposure to vasopressors and potentially mechanical ventilation. Vernakalant is a Von Williams Class III novel anti-arrhythmic agent with primary activity on atrial tissue with limited activity on ventricular myocardium. Primary mechanism of action is blocking early activating K+ atrial channels and frequency-dependent atrial Na+ channels which prolongs atrial refractory periods and decreasing atrial conduction without promoting ventricular arrhythmia. There have been many trials that proven efficacy in converting AF in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the post cardiac surgery patients, however this has never been compared to standard of care Amiodarone. Research Questions and objectives: We hypothesize administration of vernakalant compared to amiodarone will have a higher rate of cardioversion to sinus rhythm at 90 min in post-operative sustained atrial fibrillation. This will reduce duration of vasoactive medications, days in ICU and mortality. Methods: Patients will be recruited from the CVICU 24 hours after admission to CIVCU based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients identified with new presentation atrial fibrillation with a sustained duration of greater than 30 minutes will be considered for the study. Patients will be randomized to Amiodarone versus Vernakalant using a computerized process. Patients randomized to an amiodarone arm will receive 150mg IV bolus and an amiodarone infusion of 1mg/hr x 6 hours followed by 0.5mg/hr x 12 hours. Patients randomized to Vernakalant will receive a bolus of 3mg/kg over 10 minutes and an observation period of 15 minutes, if the patient is still in AF, they will receive an additional 2.0mg/kg bolus of Vernakalant. Infusions will be discontinued if QT interval becomes >550ms, heart rate less than 45 bpm lasting >30 seconds with symptoms or <40bpm lasting >30 seconds with or without symptoms, ventricular tachycardia or development of heart block. At 90 minutes rate of conversion to sinus rhythm will be documented. Secondary outcomes including time to AF conversion, recurrence of atrial fibrillation will be documented along with safety events over 48h. Duration of vasoactive medications, days in ICU, time to initiation of beta blockers, mortality, Left Ventricular (LV) function and economics of ICU still will be followed. Patients will be excluded if they return to the OR.

Tracking Information