Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Crossover AssignmentMasking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 70 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

One of the reasons for the current lack of effective therapies is that underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain after SCI are not yet fully understood. Nonetheless, as suggested by numerous studies, because of the spinal injury, the inflow of sensory information is dramatically altered. Therefore, ...

One of the reasons for the current lack of effective therapies is that underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain after SCI are not yet fully understood. Nonetheless, as suggested by numerous studies, because of the spinal injury, the inflow of sensory information is dramatically altered. Therefore, the brain is missing sensory information or receiving incorrect sensory information, which may alter the brain circuitry related to pain sensation, which in turn may drive the perception of neuropathic pain. Cognitive multisensory rehabilitation (CMR), developed for motor recovery after stroke, has shown to be effective for treating adults with chronic pain, i.e., after shoulder impingement when compared to traditional physical therapy; or in a case study of severe phantom limb pain after below the knee amputation, resulting in such substantial pain reduction that the patient could finally be fitted with a prosthesis and walk. CMR is thought to be effective because it restores mental body representations by recalibrating sensations in combination with a focus on body awareness. Body awareness is often impaired in people with chronic pain and with dysfunctions in the sensory and motor networks, such as after SCI. This study uses a cross-over study for adults with SCI and a comparison of baseline outcomes in adults with SCI vs able-bodied healthy adults to address two aims: AIM 1: Determine baseline differences in resting-state and task-based fMRI activation and connectivity in adults with SCI compared to able-bodied healthy controls. AIM 2: Identify changes in brain activation and connectivity, as well as behavioral outcomes in pain and body awareness in adults with SCI after CMR versus standard of care. More information: https://med.umn.edu/rehabmedicine/research/sci-neuropathic-pain

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04706208
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Ann Van de Winckel, Van de Winckel University of Minnesota