Screening Wizard- Phase 2
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Depression
- Suicidal Ideation
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: This study will use a parallel study design, where participants are randomized into three intervention groups ("screening as usual", Screening Wizard 2.0, Screening Wizard 2.0 + SOVA) and will receive interventions in parallel.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Outcomes assessors will be masked to the intervention condition at follow-up assessment time points.Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 12 years and 26 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Screening Wizard will be delivered by Primary Care Providers (PCPs) at well child visits, beginning with screening occurring within the waiting room which will yield decision support guidance delivered and followed by the PCP at the same visit. Assignment of Interventions: This study will randomize ...
Screening Wizard will be delivered by Primary Care Providers (PCPs) at well child visits, beginning with screening occurring within the waiting room which will yield decision support guidance delivered and followed by the PCP at the same visit. Assignment of Interventions: This study will randomize participants to one of three conditions in a 2:2:1 randomization scheme to either receive "screening as usual" (n=20), Screening Wizard 2.0 (n=40), or Screening Wizard 2.0 + SOVA (n =40) Hypothesis: H1: Screening Wizard 2.0 will result in more referrals compared to "screening as usual" (increase >30% compared to "screening as usual") H2: Screening Wizard 2.0 will result in higher rates of follow-through with mental health services compared to "screening as usual" (increase >30% compared to "screening as usual") H3: Screening Wizard 2.0 will have higher patient satisfaction compared to "screening as usual" (SW satisfaction > "screening as usual" satisfaction) H4: Adolescent and parents in Screening Wizard 2.0 + SOVA will have less negative attitudes about psychotherapy, higher depression literacy, and a higher readiness for treatment as compared to Screening Wizard 2.0 alone or "screening as usual" H5: Adolescent and parents in Screening Wizard 2.0 + SOVA will result in higher rates of follow-through with mental health services (defined as attendance at an initial appointment) compared to Screening wizard 2.0 alone (increase >10%) and "screening as usual" (increase >40%)
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04646369
- Collaborators
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Oliver Lindhiem, PhD University of Pittsburgh Study Director: Ana Radovic University of Pittsburgh
Get Well Soon