Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
PTSD
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Patients will be randomized to treatment sequences, stratified by site and baseline antidepressant use.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: The survey team members will be masked to which arm the study participant has been randomized. The PI, Co-PIs, and Co-Is will not have access to the outcomes until the primary data collection phase has been completed. The statistician will present outcomes by arm to the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) members during closed sessions of DSMB meetings.Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Background: In primary care settings, PTSD frequently goes undetected and untreated. When PTSD is diagnosed in primary care, treatment is usually inadequate and outcomes are poor. This is highly problematic because many patients with PTSD prefer receiving care in primary care settings, and less than...

Background: In primary care settings, PTSD frequently goes undetected and untreated. When PTSD is diagnosed in primary care, treatment is usually inadequate and outcomes are poor. This is highly problematic because many patients with PTSD prefer receiving care in primary care settings, and less than half are successfully referred to the specialty mental health setting. This is especially a concern for safety net primary settings such as Federally Qualified Health Centers and VA Medical Centers, where the prevalence of both past trauma exposure and PTSD are particularly high. However, there are effective pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy treatments for PTSD that are feasible to deliver in primary care. Objective: Because there are no head-to-head comparisons of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for PTSD among primary care patients, the investigators propose to 1) compare outcomes among patients randomized to initially receive pharmacotherapy or brief psychotherapy, 2) compare outcomes among patients randomized to treatment sequences (i.e., switching and augmenting) for patients not responding to the initial treatment and 3) examine variation in treatment outcomes among different subgroups of patients. Methods: This multi-site trial will enroll 1,400 patients meeting clinical criteria for PTSD from 6 Federally Qualified Health Centers and 6 VA Medical Centers. The pharmacotherapy treatments are sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine and venlafaxine. The psychotherapy treatment is Written Exposure Therapy. Telephone and web surveys will be used to assessed outcomes (patient treatment engagement, self-reported symptom burden, health related quality of life, and recovery outcomes) at baseline, 4 and 8 months. Patients will be the unit of the intent-to-treat analysis. Multiple imputation will be used for missing data. Mixed-models will be used to test hypotheses. Significance: Due to a lack of head-to-head comparisons between pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy protocols, clinical practice guidelines for PTSD provide contradictory recommendations about pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. In particular, PTSD clinical practice guidelines have little to offer primary care providers because so few trials have been conducted in this setting. The proposed large pragmatic trial will compare, head-to-head, FDA approved PTSD medications with a brief trauma-focused psychotherapy that is evidence-based and feasible to deliver in primary care. In addition, despite high treatment non-response rates, very few trials have examined treatment sequencing and none have done so in the primary care setting. For patients not responding to the initial treatment, the proposed research is powered to compare, head-to-head, alternative treatment sequences that are feasible to deliver in primary care.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04597190
Collaborators
  • Stanford University
  • Harvard University
  • Washington State University
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Investigators
Not Provided