Efficacy and Safety of Non-resorbable Uveoscleral Implant Versus Absorbable Collagen Matrix in Non-perforating Deep Sclerectomy
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Evaluations will be done an outcome assessor that do not know the intervention groupPrimary Purpose: Other
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the hypotensive efficacy at 24 months between two implants in glaucoma surgery. Non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with non-resorbable uveoscleral implant associated with absorbable collagen matrix versus non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery...
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the hypotensive efficacy at 24 months between two implants in glaucoma surgery. Non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with non-resorbable uveoscleral implant associated with absorbable collagen matrix versus non-perforating deep sclerectomy surgery with isolated absorbable collagen matrix implant.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04586738
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jéssica Botella García, MD Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Get Well Soon