The Aim of This Study is to Demonstrat That Vacuum-assisted Closure Versus Conventional Wound Closure Enables to Diminish Local Complications After Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Metastatic Skin Tumors
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Active, not recruiting
Summary
- Conditions
- Epidermoid Carcinoma
- Lymph Node Metastases
- Melanoma
- Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
- Skin Cancer
- Type
- Observational
- Design
- Observational Model: Case-ControlTime Perspective: Retrospective
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Lymphorrhoea, lymphedema and lymphocyte are significant and common complications after axillary and inguinal lymph nodes dissections. A vacuum assisted closure therapy should prevent these comorbidities. In this study, we compared PREVENA, a negative pressure wound therapy, versus conventional dress...
Lymphorrhoea, lymphedema and lymphocyte are significant and common complications after axillary and inguinal lymph nodes dissections. A vacuum assisted closure therapy should prevent these comorbidities. In this study, we compared PREVENA, a negative pressure wound therapy, versus conventional dressings. We evaluated the wound complications at the seventh day, the thirtieth day and at this end of the first year after surgery. It is a retrospective study of about ninety lymph nodes dissections among with there were seventy times the use of a negative pressure wound therapy, PREVENA.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04583605
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: Manuela PEREZ Visceral Surgery Department