Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
40

Summary

Conditions
Hip Fractures
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Patients will be divided into two treatment arms: cohort 1 will consist of patients with closed peritrochanteric femur fractures who undergo open reduction internal fixation with a Stryker© Gamma™ cephalomedullary nail using traditional fluoroscopy for insertion of the lag screw. Cohort 2 will consist of patients with closed peritrochanteric femur fractures who undergo open reduction internal fixation with a Stryker© Gamma™ cephalomedullary nail using the Stryker© ADAPT™platform to assist with insertion of the lag screw.Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Patients will be blinded to treatment group allocation, as will outcomes assessors. Clinicians performing the procedures will not be blinded.Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

This will be a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with two treatment cohorts. Cohort 1 will consist of patients with closed peritrochanteric femur fractures who undergo open reduction internal fixation with a Stryker© Gamma™ cephalomedullary nail using traditional fluoroscopy ...

This will be a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with two treatment cohorts. Cohort 1 will consist of patients with closed peritrochanteric femur fractures who undergo open reduction internal fixation with a Stryker© Gamma™ cephalomedullary nail using traditional fluoroscopy for insertion of the lag screw. Cohort 2 will consist of patients with closed peritrochanteric femur fractures who undergo open reduction internal fixation with a Stryker© Gamma™ cephalomedullary nail using the Stryker© ADAPT™ platform to assist with insertion of the lag screw. Patients will be blinded to treatment group allocation as will clinicians/researchers during data processing and analysis. The primary outcome will be tip-apex distance, as measured on anteroposterior and lateral hip radiographs. Secondary outcomes will be position of the lag screw as described by Cleveland et al, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and number of Kirschner wire passes prior to final placement of the lag screw. Additionally, evidence of lag screw cutout on hip radiographs, hip range of motion relative to the contralateral hip, overall mobility, social dependency, and pain level will be assessed at 3 month, 6 month, 1 year, and 2 year follow up visits.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04528459
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Not Provided