Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
  • Critical Illness
  • Shock
Type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Purpose: Resuscitation and hemodynamic support with intravenous (IV) vasopressors is a prime indication of treatment in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Hemodynamic support is typically provided with intravenous (IV) vasopressors. However, these have been shown to have significant negative effect...

Purpose: Resuscitation and hemodynamic support with intravenous (IV) vasopressors is a prime indication of treatment in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Hemodynamic support is typically provided with intravenous (IV) vasopressors. However, these have been shown to have significant negative effects including increased central venous catheter line associated infections, venous thromboembolic disease, impaired mobility and gastrointestinal injury and ischemia. Oral vasopressors, such as midodrine, have been historically used for hemodynamic support in non-critically ill patients, but their study in patients as IV pressor sparing therapy has been limited. Hypothesis: to evaluate the expanded role of midodrine for any vasoplegic patients in the ICU. Justification: In 2018, there were 1,613 admissions to the adult general systems ICU (GSICU) at the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH). Patients were sick, with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE) score of 21.3, with 36.4% requiring vasopressors on admission, accounting for 1942 patient-days (data from eCritical TRACER database). In the environment strained healthcare resources and limited ICU capacity, the ability to safely wean patients from IV vasopressors with transition to oral hemodynamic supporting agents would greatly improve how patients navigate through the healthcare system. This in turn will improve patient-centered case. Primary Objective: To determine if recruitment for LIBERATE is achievable and feasible To compare the effect of enteral midodrine vs placebo on duration of vasopressor support Secondary Objective: To compare the effect of enteral midodrine vs. placebo on: ICU length of stay 90-day all-cause mortality Rate of re-initiation of IV vasopressors Rates of ICU re-admission Adverse events Research Method/Procedures: The LIBERATE Trial is a single centre, concealed-allocation parallel-group blinded pilot RCT. Patients will be randomly assigned to midodrine (enteral, 10mg every 8h) or placebo (carboxymethocellulose sodium) for the duration of their IV vasopressor therapy and 24h following the discontinuation of their IV vasopressor therapy. The recruitment target is 60 patients (i.e., 30 patients per arm) with full follow-up to ensure feasibility. Study personnel at the clinical sites will document the ICU length of stay. Daily assessment will occur for re-initiation of IV vasopressors and ICU re-admission. Patients will be followed at 90 days for mortality. Plan for Data Analysis: Analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes will involve summary measures obtained by aggregating the endpoints using Stata software package (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Baseline comparisons will be performed using chi-squared test for equal proportions with results to be reported as numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals. Continuous normally distributed variables will be compared using paired t-tests and reported as means with 95% confidence intervals, while non-normally distributed will be compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and reported as medians and interquartile ranges.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04489589
Collaborators
  • Alberta Health Services
  • Institute of Health Economics, Canada
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Oleksa G Rewa, MD MSc University of Alberta