Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 65 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
This is a prospective, parallel, randomized, open labeled, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of nedaplatin versus cisplatin in induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma pati...
This is a prospective, parallel, randomized, open labeled, phase III, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of nedaplatin versus cisplatin in induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in endemic area - nedaplatin, docetaxel and fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy regimen combined with nedaplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DNF-N) versus cisplatin, docetaxel and fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy regimen combined with cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DPF-P). All patients will receive radical intense modulate radiation therapy (IMRT). The primary endpoint is progress free survival (PFS).
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04437329
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: Jinquan Liu, M.D Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
Get Well Soon