Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
  • Family
  • Prodromal Schizophrenia
  • Prodromal Symptoms
  • Psychosis
  • Psychotic Disorders
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: FFT-CHR assists families with (1) recognizing the youth's psychosis risk symptoms and warning signs of escalating risk, (2) understanding vulnerability to psychosis and interventions, and (3) operating effectively as a unit. The manual includes session instructions and handouts. The Enhanced care (EC) condition has also been manualized and tested as a family educational treatment in CHR and bipolar youth. The 3 weekly sessions involve an abridged form of FFT-CHR psychoeducation. Then the youth has monthly individual sessions focused on applying the prevention plan and nondirective problem-solving of conflicts. The clinician serves as case manager. See further description below.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 13 years and 25 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

This randomized, single blind trial will compare outcomes from a 6-month FFT-CHR intervention and a control condition (enhanced care, or EC) matched to the FFT-CHR in duration (6 months) and access to a clinician. Participants families in FFT-CHR are provided 18 family sessions augmented by a therap...

This randomized, single blind trial will compare outcomes from a 6-month FFT-CHR intervention and a control condition (enhanced care, or EC) matched to the FFT-CHR in duration (6 months) and access to a clinician. Participants families in FFT-CHR are provided 18 family sessions augmented by a therapy app with content and surveys, while participants in the EC condition are provided three family sessions plus five monthly individual support and case management sessions. Duration of therapy sessions is one hour. Main Goals of FFT-CHR (Experimental Treatment) To assist young clients and their family in: developing a common understanding of CHR symptoms; recognizing early signs of escalating symptoms; practicing individual and family coping strategies; and pre-planning family responses to any escalation in symptoms. When families have poor understanding of CHR symptoms and strategies for their management, this can fuel stressful home dynamics and contribute to youth withdrawal and decompensation. For the youth and their family members to learn to express more constructive messages during their interactions, particularly regarding highly charged topics such as curbing risky behaviors and management of the offspring's symptoms. For youth and family members to practice skills for resolving family or extrafamilial conflicts (usually those related to the youth's functioning) through effective communication and problem solving The control condition, Enhanced Care (EC) shares the psychoeducation goal of FFT-CHR but is more oriented toward skill-training for the individual patient. Whereas it does not offer the same level of opportunity for families to build communication and problem-solving skills, the family is actively involved in helping the individual develop a relapse prevention plan. Monthly individual sessions focus on the development of individual coping skills such as symptom tracking and problem-solving. Both conditions require families to submit real-time mobile app surveys to assist with progress tracking. Study Aims The primary clinical outcomes are prodromal positive symptom scores examined immediately after treatment (6 months) and at 18 months. Secondary outcomes are time to remission of positive symptoms and psychosocial functioning over 18 months. Temporal relationships between early changes in treatment targets and later changes in symptoms or psychosocial functioning will also be examined. Primary Hypotheses FFT-CHR (vs. EC) will be associated with greater improvement in positive symptoms by end of therapy and follow-up (6 and 18 months), and greater high-risk syndrome remission and better psychosocial functioning at 18 months FFT-CHR (vs. EC) will be associated with greater improvement in family communication and problem solving at 6 months FFT-CHR (vs. EC) will be associated with greater improvement in youth-perceived parental criticism at 6 months. In turn, improvements in family communication, problem-solving and youths' perceptions of criticism will be associated with downstream improvements in the youths' primary outcomes (positive symptoms) and secondary outcomes (time to remission and psychosocial functioning) over 18 months. Thus, improvements in family functioning are hypothesized to mediate the relationship between treatment condition (FFT-CHR, EC) and changes in primary and secondary outcomes in the individual with CHR syndrome. CHR individuals with higher baseline risk of conversion are hypothesized to improve more on family communication over 6 months and primary and secondary outcomes over 18 months in FFT-CHR than in EC.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04338152
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Investigators
Principal Investigator: David J. Miklowitz, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles Principal Investigator: Carrie E. Bearden, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles Principal Investigator: Kristin S. Cadenhead, M.D. University of California, San Diego Principal Investigator: Scott Woods, M.D. Yale University Principal Investigator: Jean M. Addington, Ph.D. University of Calgary Principal Investigator: Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian, Ph.D. Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts Mental Health Center Principal Investigator: Andrea M. Auther, Ph.D. Zucker Hillside Hospital at Hofstra / Northwell Health Principal Investigator: Barbara A. Cornblatt, Ph.D., M.B.A. Hofstra University / Northwell Health Principal Investigator: Daniel H. Mathalon, Ph.D., M.D. University of California, San Francisco Principal Investigator: Holly K. Hamilton, Ph.D. University of California, San Francisco