Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Double (Participant, Investigator)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 24 years and 55 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
In accordance with a split-mouth design, 50 patients will be received at least one pair of restorations, restored with a nanofill resin composite (Filtek Ultimate [FU]) and with a bulk fill resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill [TB]). Each restorative resin will be used with its respective adhe...
In accordance with a split-mouth design, 50 patients will be received at least one pair of restorations, restored with a nanofill resin composite (Filtek Ultimate [FU]) and with a bulk fill resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill [TB]). Each restorative resin will be used with its respective adhesive system according to the manufacturers' instructions. A total of 104 class II restorations will be placed by two operators. The restorations will be blindly evaluated by two examiners at baseline and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7- and 8- year using modified US Public Health Service Ryge criteria. The comparison of the two restorative materials for each category will be performed with the chi-square test (a=0.05). The baseline scores will be compared with those at the recall visits using the Cochran Q-test.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04320576
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: Ayse R Yazici, DDS, PhD Hacettepe University School of Dentistry
Get Well Soon