Hip Abductor Muscle Dysfunction After Nailing of Proximal Femoral Fractures, Incidence and Contributing Factors.

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

In a group of patients treated at our hospital for fracture of the proximal femur using different generations of the proximal femoral nail and after full fracture union, although they had an excellent hip function we noticed that the majority of the patients still suffering from limping and abductor...

In a group of patients treated at our hospital for fracture of the proximal femur using different generations of the proximal femoral nail and after full fracture union, although they had an excellent hip function we noticed that the majority of the patients still suffering from limping and abductor lurch with a Trendelenburg gait. Purpose: to detect hip abductor muscle dysfunction after treating proximal femoral fracture using a proximal femoral nail (short type) Research Questions: what is the reason(s) for remaining abductor lurch in patients with proximal femoral fracture treated with PFN? Study Design: an observational retrospective Study Group number: 20 patients (to be modified according to the number of patients registered at the study setting) Assessment: (will be measured on both operated and non-operated sides) Clinical: Harris hip score. Leg length discrepancy: measured as the true length from the ASIS to the medial malleolus. The bulk of the abductor musculature: measured as the distance between the ASIS anteriorly and the ischial tuberosity posteriorly. Trendelenburg gait: assessed using modified McKay criteria2. These criteria measure pain symptoms, gait pattern, Trendelenburg sign status, and the range of hip joint movement Radiological: Fracture union: assessed using Apley and Solomon's criteria6. Complete bone union according to these criteria is defined as the time at which there is no pain upon local palpation, no swelling in the limb, ability to walk without support and pain-free, and evidence of a radiographic bridging callus or trabecula between fragments. Neck shaft angle: as the angle between the neck axis and the anatomical axis of the proximal femur. Leg length discrepancy: as the distance between a fixed reference point on the lesser trochanter on both sides and the trans-ischial line. Amount of nail prominent from the greater trochanter. Hip horizontal offset: the length of a line drawn from the centre of the femoral head and perpendicular to the anatomical axis of the femur. Neurophysiological: EMG will be carried out to examine the (superior gluteal nerve) SGN for all patients. The EMGs will be performed by the same neurophysiologist. The muscles will be evaluated according to the criteria of the American Academy of Electrophysiological Medicine for needle EMG. In order to exclude patients with polyneuropathy, radiculopathy, or plexopathy, nerve conduction studies of both lower extremities will be performed. Then, gluteus medius muscles will be assessed bilaterally to evaluate the SGN, the vastus medialis muscle for L4 root, tibialis anterior muscle for L5 root, and gastrocnemius muscle for S1 root. First, resting activities will be assessed for the signs of acute denervation (fibrillation and positive sharp waves), followed by observation of the recruitment pattern examination of the motor unit action potential (MUAP) amplitudes, and time characteristics. Finally, motor patterns of interferences will be investigated during muscle contractions to obtain information about denervation and reinnervation of examined muscles Outcomes to be measured: Primary outcome: Neurophysiological status of Hip abductors function (EMG) Secondary outcome: HHS, altered radiological hip biomechanics

Tracking Information