Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

The rationale of the study is based on the fact that manual and intraoperative modeling of an osteosynthesis mesh is an employee operator and even in the case of very experienced operators it is always difficult, inaccurate and slow. The use of this pre-modeled and pre-fabricated custom-made mesh wi...

The rationale of the study is based on the fact that manual and intraoperative modeling of an osteosynthesis mesh is an employee operator and even in the case of very experienced operators it is always difficult, inaccurate and slow. The use of this pre-modeled and pre-fabricated custom-made mesh with bevel margins and three-dimensionally morphology adapted to the bone defect, would allow for a congruous bone regeneration reducing the operating times, the risks linked to the mesh trauma, and the discomfort for the patient. The collagen membrane in association with titanium, based on the principles of guided bone regeneration (GBR), would make it possible to increase bone gain and reduce the percentage of early and late exposure of the mesh. This study aims to evaluate, in cases of maxillary and mandibular atrophies characterized by a vertical and / or horizontal resorption of the alveolar bone, the percentage of complications (intra- and post-operative) after bone regeneration using custom-made mesh with or without collagen membrane. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of technique B (custom-made mesh - without membrane) compared to technique A (custom-made mesh - with membrane) in the incidence of complications. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the missing bone volume (lacking bone volume or LBV), reconstructed bone volume (reconstructed bone volume or RBV) with respect to planned bone volume (planned bone volume or PBV), histological and histomorphometric analysis at the time removal of the mesh and peri-implant bone resorption, due to the functional loading of the implants, at 12 months of follow-up. Other objectives include the qualitative evaluation of bone regeneration by histological and histomorphometric analysis upon removal of the mesh; and the evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption, due to the functional loading of the implants, at 12 months of follow-up. This is a clinical trial which is promoted by Prof. Claudio Marchetti and the University Hospital of Bologna - Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi. The study is designed as a pilot, randomized, monocentric, independent, parallel-group clinical trial, in which the variables will be analyzed prospectively. The study will have a selection and enrollment period of approximately 12 months; a treatment period of about 12 months. As a result, the overall duration of the study will be around 24 months. In the two-year period 2017/2019 the study will include the treatment of 30 patients, in good general health, suffering from partial edentulism of the maxilla and / or jaw with vertical and / or horizontal resorption of the alveolar bone, which require prosthetic rehabilitation supported by implants to improve function and aesthetics of edentulous areas. Patients will be divided into 2 study groups and assigned to each study group based on the previously computer-generated randomization sequence: 15 patients (group A, control) will be treated by bone regeneration with custom-made mesh without a collagen membrane. 15 patients (group B, test) will be treated by bone regeneration with custom-made mesh with collagen membrane. In the following table, the 3 treatment phases: The first phase (T0) involved bone regeneration with a custom-made mesh (group A) and with collagen membrane (group B); the second one (T1), subsequently, after 6 months: will forsee the removal of the regeneration device and the insertion of the implants; the thirt (T2), 3 months after the aforementioned, will forsee the final functional loading of the implants, with a consequent follow-up of the regenerated bone. All the materials and tools that will be used in the study are CE certified (with the exception of the custom-made mesh which, as a custom-made device, does not require CE certification) and have already been used in the normal care path for patients who have undergone bone regeneration. Moreover, the control visits and the radiological investigations of the data foreseen by the aforementioned protocol will be collected; They will be summarized in the case report form (CRF), and are those that characterize the normal care path of patients undergoing necessary bone regeneration for prosthetic implant rehabilitation when the bone quantity is insufficient. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of technique B (digital technique) compared to technique A (traditional technique) in the incidence of complications. The Secondary objectives include: assessment of patient and operator benefits, reconstructed bone volume (RBV) compared to planned bone volume (PBV), histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone quality obtained and peri-implant bone resorption after 12 months of follow-up. The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 15 per group. The results obtained in the two study groups will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and the differences between groups will be tested by means of appropriate statistical tests for purely exploratory and non-demonstrative purposes. The patient will be considered as the statistical unit of the analysis, and the statistical significance will be set at ? = 0.05. The collected data will be grouped and summarized with respect to the demographic, anamnestic, and clinical variables of each patient. Exploratory analyses will be performed using descriptive statistics. The data will be presented both for the intent-to-treat population and for the per-protocol population. The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 15 per group. The sample size was calculated using dedicated statistical software (STATA, StataCorp LLC) through Pearson's chi-squared test, guaranteeing a level of significance of 95% and a power of 80%.

Tracking Information