Contrast Specific Echocardiogram Versus Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO) Imaging Settings
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Contrast Echocardiography Imaging
- Type
- Observational
- Design
- Observational Model: Case-ControlTime Perspective: Retrospective
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Ultrasound testing of the heart using a "dye" or contrast is often used to get clear pictures of the heart in many heart conditions. When this test is done when the heart is working hard, such as when exercising, this is called contrast stress echocardiography. Current guidelines recommend the metho...
Ultrasound testing of the heart using a "dye" or contrast is often used to get clear pictures of the heart in many heart conditions. When this test is done when the heart is working hard, such as when exercising, this is called contrast stress echocardiography. Current guidelines recommend the method called "contrast specific imaging setting," as the best way of looking at the main pumping part of the heart. However, it is not known if it provides better pictures when compared to a different method called "left ventricular opacification (LVO)." This study will compare pictures in patients who have had tests done using both ways of looking at the heart and will compare; LVO; enhanced and unenhanced LVEBD; LVO imaging with contrast specific imaging Wall Motion Classification and LVO to contrast specific imaging Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF). The comparison will be done by a group of experts in cardiac ultrasound.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04286100
- Collaborators
- Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Investigators
- Not Provided