HA-WBRT vs SRS in Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Brain Metastases
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Single (Care Provider)Masking Description: Observer-blindingPrimary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
For patients suffering from multiple brain metastases whole brain radiation therapy still constitutes a standard therapy. However, because of the risk of neurocognitive side effects as well as reduced local tumor control, employment of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more common. The dis...
For patients suffering from multiple brain metastases whole brain radiation therapy still constitutes a standard therapy. However, because of the risk of neurocognitive side effects as well as reduced local tumor control, employment of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more common. The disadvantage of SRS alone may be poor intracranial tumor control because of frequent appearance of new distant brain metastases after therapy. In recent years hippocampal avoidance whole brain therapy has been shown to minimize treatment related side effects while reducing the rate of distant intracranial failure. In this study patients will be randomized to receive either hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy with integrated tumor boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) or stereotactic radiosurgery. The investigators hypothesize that HA-WBRT+SIB can improve intracranial tumor control compared to stereotactic radiosurgery, while avoiding additional neurocognitive side effects.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04277403
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Not Provided