Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Accompanied by Mid Urethral Sling Versus no Sling for Reduction of Postoperative Incontinence
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Quality of Life
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Vaginal Hysterectomy
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2Phase 3
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: If patient gives consent and falls on selection criteria (inclusion and exclusion), she will be enrolled for randomization. Written informed consent will be taken. Computer generated simple randomization will be done.filled. POP-Q, Occult SUI and ESST will be checked and noted. This will be done by one of the researcher. Surgery will be performed by one of the researcher. Both Group I and Group II patients will undergo vaginal hysterectomy with McCall's culdoplasty and anterior repair with or without posterior repair according to the need. Patient who falls in Group I will undergo midurethral sling with tension free vaginal tape (TVT). Patient will be followed up at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome of the study will be the difference in SUI. Secondary outcomes will be BFLUTS AND udi-6 SCORE, voiding dysfunction, dyspareunia, patient satisfaction and complications during surgery.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: those who will be filling questionnaires before and after the surgery are maskedPrimary Purpose: Prevention
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 20 years and 80 years
- Gender
- Only males
Description
Aim: To de termine the effect of mid urethral sling in reducing postoperative incontinence after vaginal prolapse surgery. General Objectives: To compare the risk of de novo postoperative incontinence between prolapsed surgery with mid urethral sling versus no sling. Specific Objectives: to compare ...
Aim: To de termine the effect of mid urethral sling in reducing postoperative incontinence after vaginal prolapse surgery. General Objectives: To compare the risk of de novo postoperative incontinence between prolapsed surgery with mid urethral sling versus no sling. Specific Objectives: to compare the change in score of BFLUTS-SF (Bristol Female lower urinary tract symptoms- sexual function) and UDI-6 (Urinary distress inventory-6) pre and post surgery between the two groups. Research Hypothesis: The use of mid urethral sling after vaginal prolapse surgery has role in reduction of postoperative incontinence. Materials & Methods: Whether study involves humans/animals or both : Humans Population/ participants: Patients with pelvic organ prolapse who are planned for vaginal prolapse surgery in BPKIHS (BP Koirala Institute of Health and Sciences). Type of study design: a randomized controlled trial (e) Expected sample size: 54 Sample size calculation: Previous study done by Control groups: Patient undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery only without mid urethral sling. There will be small incision in the suprapubic region that mimics the TVT incision. (f) Probable duration of study: one and half year (g) Setting: BPKIHS, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (h) Parameter/Variables to be applied/ measured: Age, BMI, POPQ (Pelvic organ prolapse quantification) stage, menopause, ESST (Empty supine stress test). (i) Outcome measures: LUTS score, UDI-6 score, SUI (stress urinary incontinence), Voiding dysfunction, dyspareunia, satisfaction, Complications like bladder injury, hemorrhage. (j) Rationale for statistical methods to be employed: attached (k) Ethical clearance: Study will be started after getting clearance from the IRC (Institutional review committee) of BPKIHS . (l) Permission to use copyright questionnaire/Proforma: Pre designed Proforma and questionnaire will be used to collect the data. The internationally valid questionnaire in English will be validated in Nepali language first and then it will be used. (m) Maintain the confidentiality of subject: The confidentiality of the patients will be maintained throughout the research.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04251923
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Chair: Mohan ch Regmi, Professor BPKIHS