Validation of Cognitive Enhancement Techniques for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Primary Aim: Difference in Cognitive and Neurophysiological Function between SMART and TCR. Multilevel mixed-effect modeling will be conducted for Aim 1 with treatment modality (SMART vs. TCR) as the independent variable. This approach will take into consideration between-subject variance based on randomized group, as well as within-subject variance for repeated measures. Primary analyses will be based on intention to treat, and we will leverage the statistical power of multilevel modeling to handle missing follow-up data. Outcome will be assessed as change in GDS over time. A significant p-value of 0.05 will be used to assess the main effects.Masking: Single (Participant)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Younger than 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Cognitive Rehabilitation for mild brain injury has shown some modest evidence of effectiveness. CR interventions for mTBI typically focus on compensating for subjective and functional cognitive complaints. A number of recent studies have examined the use of compensatory CR approaches for individuals...
Cognitive Rehabilitation for mild brain injury has shown some modest evidence of effectiveness. CR interventions for mTBI typically focus on compensating for subjective and functional cognitive complaints. A number of recent studies have examined the use of compensatory CR approaches for individuals (primarily military veterans) diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment from a likely mTBI. These interventions taught individuals adaptive functional skills (e.g., cognitive mnemonics) and highlighted use of external aids such as smart phone scheduling/reminder applications. A randomized control trial that included 16 veterans with TBI (mixed mild and moderate severity), found this compensatory CR intervention was effective at reducing overall symptoms, but did not impact cognitive performance or work-outcomes. In a secondary study, there was some evidence that the compensatory CR intervention improved memory at 6 months post-treatment and quality of life at 12 months but there was not a consistent pattern of improvement compared to controls. Generalizability from civilian and veteran communities to active duty SMs may pose some unique and unexplored factors as the goal of treatment is not remediation of common activities of daily living (e.g., remembering appointments) but in contrast, the goal is military readiness needed for worldwide deployability to potential wartime environments (e.g., "cognitive readiness").
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04245124
- Collaborators
- The University of Texas at Dallas
- Investigators
- Not Provided
Get Well Soon