Safe Options for ACL Recovery
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Opioid Use
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Prevention
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 12 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
The goal of this study is to test whether the ACL-OERP intervention (vs. a treatment as usual [TAU] comparison) improves knowledge of (1) risks associated with opioid self-administration (development of tolerance, dangers of concomitant sedative use, taking as prescribed for safety), (2) expected pa...
The goal of this study is to test whether the ACL-OERP intervention (vs. a treatment as usual [TAU] comparison) improves knowledge of (1) risks associated with opioid self-administration (development of tolerance, dangers of concomitant sedative use, taking as prescribed for safety), (2) expected pain following ACL reconstruction, (3) accurate pain assessment, (4) and weaning from opioid to non-narcotic analgesics. There will be one control arm (TAU) and two intervention arms, both of which are experimental. Both will receive the ACL-OERP before surgery, and the second arm will also receive a "booster" intervention session of the intervention 3 days after surgery. In addition, investigators wish to compare the amount of opioid self-administered in the intervention groups (vs. TAU comparison) to assess whether this knowledge reduces self-administration of opioid. The project will also examine whether the implementation of the booster intervention session in the third arm improves these outcomes compared to the other intervention arm.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04225468
- Collaborators
- University of Memphis
- Campbell Clinic
- Investigators
- Not Provided
Get Well Soon