Does ACL Augmented With LEAT Better Controls Rotational Laxity Than Isolated ACL Reconstruction?
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: Non-RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Non-randomized 1:1 allocationMasking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Outcomes Assessor will be blinded to the patient groupPrimary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 15 years and 25 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
This study is a non-randomized clinical trial including 40 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury who are undergoing surgery and will be allocated 1:1 to either isolated ACL reconstruction (control group) or ACL reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (experimental gr...
This study is a non-randomized clinical trial including 40 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury who are undergoing surgery and will be allocated 1:1 to either isolated ACL reconstruction (control group) or ACL reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (experimental group). The principal outcome of this work is the sagittal and rotational knee laxity analysis and side-to-side and 2-year improvement. The secondary outcomes include graft failure (re-tears) and the patient-reported outcome measures (KOOS) at 2 years follow-up.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04136990
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Director: João Espregueira-Mendes, MD, PhD Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence Principal Investigator: Renato Andrade Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence
Get Well Soon