Comparison of Ketamine and Etomidate During Rapid Sequence Intubation in Trauma Patients
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Shock, Traumatic
- Trauma
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: ketamine group: ketamine 2 mg/kg iv as induction agent etomidate group: etomidate 0.2 mg/kg iv as induction agentMasking: None (Open Label)Masking Description: open labelPrimary Purpose: Other
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 19 years and 70 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
In trauma patients, rapid sequence intubation is recommended. The drug of choice, however, has been debated. One cohort comparative study showed ketamine had benefit in hemodynamics compared to etomidate in trauma patients. One observational study showed in high shock index patients, ketamine showed...
In trauma patients, rapid sequence intubation is recommended. The drug of choice, however, has been debated. One cohort comparative study showed ketamine had benefit in hemodynamics compared to etomidate in trauma patients. One observational study showed in high shock index patients, ketamine showed maintain systolic blood pressure. And other retrospective showed less clinical hypotension was less in ketamine. However there is no randomized controlled study comparing ketamine and etomidate in trauma patients. The purpose of this study is comparing the effects of hemodynamics between ketamine and etomidate in high shock index trauma patients.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04120870
- Collaborators
- Unimedics (http://unimedics.co.kr)
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: In Kyong Yi, MD Ajou University School of Medicine