Study of Nivolumab in Combination w Radium-223 in Men w Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Drug combination rationale Radium-223 is a calcium-mimetic radiopharmaceutical that has been approved for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Accumulating in areas of high bone turnover, such as bony metastases, radium-223 emits high energy alpha radiation within a narrow range thereby limiting...

Drug combination rationale Radium-223 is a calcium-mimetic radiopharmaceutical that has been approved for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Accumulating in areas of high bone turnover, such as bony metastases, radium-223 emits high energy alpha radiation within a narrow range thereby limiting toxicity (12). A pivotal phase III trial among patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bony metastases led to the approval of radium-223 (13). When compared to placebo, treatment with radium-223 resulted in an improved overall survival (OS) (3.6 months, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83). This benefit was accompanied by no clinically significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events between the two arms other than cytopenias. Patients also experienced a significant improvement in quality of life measures (14) with radium-223 compared to placebo. Immunotherapy is a promising area of research in many areas of oncology. However, only PROVENGE is currently approved in mCRPC, with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab previously demonstrating limited clinical efficacy. Beer et al evaluated ipilimumab monotherapy versus placebo in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic men with mCRPC (15). Patients could not have visceral metastatic disease or prior chemotherapy. There was no improvement in OS, the primary endpoint of this study, with ipilimumab over placebo. The median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) for ipilimumab versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) with placebo (HR 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88-1.39; P = .3667). There was suggestion of some clinical response with the ipilimumab arm demonstrating more PSA responses (23% vs 8%) and a longer median PFS (5.6 months vs 3.8 months). de Bono reported on the clinical efficacy of single agent pembrolizumab in mCRPC patients (16). They evaluated clinical activity based on the disease control rate (DCR), defined as no disease progression (i.e. CR + PR + SD). Eleven percent of patients had DCR of 6 months or greater, median follow up less than 12 months at the time of the study reporting. 19% of patients experienced any degree of PSA decline and 11% of patients had a 50% reduction or greater to PSA as the best response to therapy. Topalian et al evaluated the early safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy nivolumab in the basket trial CA209-003. Of the 296 patients treated, 17 were patients with CRPC. However, no objective responses (complete response or partial response) were seen in this patient population (17). Overall the response rate is modest, demonstrating some activity with immunotherapy but suggesting that combination therapy may be a more attractive approach. Recently the results of a prospective clinical trial of ipilimumab (CTLA-4 antagonist) and nivolumab (PD-1 antagonist) combination was reported in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (18). 79 patients were treated and included patients who had previously progressed on docetaxel (cohort 2) and those who were docetaxel naïve (cohort 1). The objective response rate was 10% and 26% respectively. This therapy led to a significant number of significant adverse events, with a grade 3-4 AE rate of 51% and 39% respectively. A separate prospective pilot clinical trial in patients with high-risk disease as defined by presence of AR-V7 expression was also recently reported. The objective response rate was 25% in men with RECIST measurable disease and a 13% PSA response rate was observed overall (19). These studies demonstrate the significant improvement in clinical activity of combination immunotherapy over single-agent treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Overall the responses are still low even with the combination of multiple checkpoint inhibitors. Many intrinsic mechanisms of resistance may account for this relative lack of efficacy including minimal baseline immune infiltration within the tumor (20), presence of immunosuppressive cells such as myeloid derived suppressor cells within the tumor microenvironment (21), and low tumor mutation burden leading to a lack of significant antigenicity (22). External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been shown in preclinical models to alter the tumor microenvironment and may work synergistically with PD-1 inhibition. EBRT plus PD-1 inhibition resulted in improved tumor control compared to either agent alone in murine models (23). Alteration to PD-1 expression has also been observed with radium-223, suggesting potential synergy of these two strategies (24). Promotion of antigen presentation and antigen spreading may account for some of the beneficial effects of this combination in addition to the observed immunomodulatory effects on T-lymphocyte populations (25). The combination of EBRT plus checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated promising efficacy in some early phase clinical trials (26,27). Kwon et al evaluated men with mCRPC who had progressed on docetaxel to receive radiation therapy to a bone metastasis followed by randomization to ipilimumab or placebo (28). The median OS was prolonged with ipilimumab (11.2 months vs 10.0 months). However, given high toxicity early with ipilimumab, the primary endpoint was not statistically significant (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.72-1.00; p=0.053). This benefit was even more evident in patients with good risk disease (median OS 22.7 mo vs 15.8 mo; HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86; p=0.0038). This suggests that radiation therapy may provide added benefit to immunotherapy compared to ipilimumab monotherapy, especially in patients with a more favorable biology such as in patients lacking visceral metastasis (29) as will be tested in this clinical trial of nivolumab plus radium-223. T-regulatory cells (defined as CD4+/FOXP3+ T-cells) are immune suppressive. A higher concentration in PBMCs and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes has been shown to correlate with an increased risk of disease relapse in localized renal cell carcinoma (30). Additionally, it also is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with metastatic melanoma (31). CD8+ T-cells are cytotoxic to tumor cells. A high level of CD8+ T-cells has recently been associated with an increased response to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (32). CD8+ and CD4+/FOXP3+ T-cell concentrations are associated with overall prognosis in patients with metastatic melanoma (33). The concentration of CD8+ lymphocytes is low in patients with prostate cancer (34). Animal models suggest that the combination of radiation therapy and checkpoint inhibitors provides synergistic activity through the alteration of the tumor microenvironment with increased CD8+ T-lymphocytes (35). Radium-223 may overcome some of these mechanisms of resistance to single-agent checkpoint inhibitor therapy though immunomodulatory effects of radiation therapy to the microenvironment in addition to direct cytotoxicity of tumor cells leading to increased antigen presentation. We hypothesize that radium-223 plus nivolumab will result in significant, favorable tumor microenvironment alterations leading to significant clinical activity in mCRPC.

Tracking Information