TIPS Plus Transvenous Obliteration for Gastric Varices

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Liver cirrhosis-or scarring of the liver-occurs with a worldwide prevalence approximating 4.5-9.5%, affecting hundreds of millions of people. Cirrhosis results in 2% of all global mortality, approximating 1 million deaths per year, and affects more than 600,000 persons in the United States. Variceal...

Liver cirrhosis-or scarring of the liver-occurs with a worldwide prevalence approximating 4.5-9.5%, affecting hundreds of millions of people. Cirrhosis results in 2% of all global mortality, approximating 1 million deaths per year, and affects more than 600,000 persons in the United States. Variceal hemorrhage (VH) from gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gastric varices (GVs) occur in 5-33% of patients with cirrhotic liver disease and have a bleeding incidence of 25% within 2-years of development, 36% within 3-years, and 44% within 5-years. GVs are associated with high mortality rates approximating 25% at 2-years. First-line therapy in patients who have not bled includes preventative pharmaceuticals, while acute bleeding is typically treated with vasoconstrictive agents and endoscopic variceal ligation or sclerotherapy. In cases of acute hemorrhage, refractory bleeding, or high risk GVs, Interventional Radiology (IR) guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation is recommended to decompress varices and divert blood flow through a controlled synthetic conduit. In the modern era, TIPS is associated with initial GV bleeding control in greater than 90% of cases. However, GV rebleeding rates after TIPS are non-trivial, widely ranging between 13-53%. Moreover, GVs are widely thought to remain patent and sustain bleeding at low portosystemic pressure gradients (PSGs), as is the case after TIPS. In addition, TIPS can also contribute to high rates hepatic encephalopathy (HE) due to increased portosystemic shunting. Recently, transvenous obliteration techniques-including balloon-occluded retrograde (BRTO) and antegrade (BATO) transvenous obliteration as well as more recent adaptations including coil- (CARTO) and plug-assisted (PARTO) retrograde transvenous obliteration-have been developed with the intent of directly eradicating GVs. While obliteration techniques are associated with high technical success rates approximating 91-100% and low rebleeding incidence less than 5%, the worsened portal hypertension that follows from GV closure results in adverse side effects, including aggravation of esophageal varices (EVs) in 33% of patients, development of new or worsening of ascites in 10% of patients, and formation of difficult to treat ectopic varices. Traditionally, TIPS and transvenous obliteration have evolved in relative isolation as different philosophical strategies to address VH. TIPS is more commonly utilized in North America and Europe, where portal decompression with or without adjunctive embolization of varices has been a mainstay of endovascular strategy. Conversely, transvenous obliteration evolved in Asia as a direct treatment of VH by obliterating GEVs (particularly GVs) via sclerosis. These approaches were previously viewed as in conflict with one another as obliteration closes GVs but aggravates portal hypertension, whereas TIPS is designed to reduce portal hypertension. Increasingly, however, TIPS and transvenous obliteration are viewed as complimentary procedures that can be combined to reduce bleeding risk and ameliorate sequelae of portal hypertension. Performed together, TIPS and transvenous obliteration result in the elimination of high flow GVs that are at risk for life threatening hemorrhage, with replacement by a man-made endovascular created portosystemic shunt that is not at risk for rupture as well as reduction the risk for post-obliteration EV aggravation, ascites formation, or development of ectopic varices. Yet, despite a strong mechanistic basis for their combination, there are few studies investigating the effectiveness of combined TIPS plus transvenous obliteration. Thus, the overarching goal of this single center prospective pilot study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of combined TIPS creation plus transvenous obliteration for the treatment of GVs.

Tracking Information