Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
14

Summary

Conditions
  • Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Tetraplegia
Type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Crossover AssignmentIntervention Model Description: All participants will receive nerve transfer surgery. Half of the participants will receive 6 weeks of robotic training starting one year after the surgery. The other half of the participants will receive 6 weeks of robotic training starting one year plus 6 weeks after the nerve transfer surgery.Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: The outcomes assessor will not have knowledge of the time point at which they are assessing the participant.Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 50 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

The recovery of hand and arm function is of critical importance for decreasing long-term care costs and increasing quality of life for individuals with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI). A subset of these individuals, with injuries in the mid to low cervical spinal cord, are candidates for...

The recovery of hand and arm function is of critical importance for decreasing long-term care costs and increasing quality of life for individuals with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI). A subset of these individuals, with injuries in the mid to low cervical spinal cord, are candidates for nerve transfer surgery. Nerve transfer surgery restores function after SCI through coaptation of redundant, intact donor nerves to recipient nerves arising at or below the level of SCI. The use of nerve transfer after SCI is relatively novel and many patients exhibit a remarkable recovery of hand and arm motor function in the months that follow, however others show a much more limited recovery. The extent of recovery is likely limited, in part, by variability in rehabilitation and the ability of the motor cortex to incorporate the new peripheral circuitry resulting from this surgical procedure. There is a critical need to determine the response of cortical motor networks to nerve transfer and the role that rehabilitation plays in supporting cortical plasticity and motor recovery. If this need is not met, incomplete recovery from this state-of-the-art surgical intervention will persist and the potential application to a wider patient population will not be realized. The investigators will test the central hypothesis that nerve transfer surgery after cervical SCI creates a novel cortical motor network, which can support the return of dexterous hand/forelimb function through rehabilitation-dependent remodeling. The hypothesis has been based upon 1) previous work in an animal model showing that rehabilitation reshapes cortical motor maps, 2) the pioneering work of a handful of clinicians, including the study collaborator, Justin Brown, that have applied nerve transfer to bypass spinal levels affected by injury, and 3) recent work using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in human SCI to map the cortical representation of arm muscles in the zone of partial preservation, and the ability to improve hand-arm function through intensive robotic training in chronically impaired subjects. The use of TMS to map cortical motor networks will allow the investigators to measure the cortical reorganization resulting from nerve transfer and determine the extent to which rehabilitation can engage this alternative cortical motor network. The rationale for the proposed studies is that a determination of the mechanisms that support rehabilitation-mediated recovery after nerve transfer will be required for optimizing and refining current clinical practice.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT04041063
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital
Investigators
Not Provided