A RCT to Compare Early Continence Recovery After RARP With or Without Sustainable Functional Urethral Reconstruction
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Urinary Incontinence
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 40 years and 75 years
- Gender
- Only males
Description
Early urinary incontinence has always been a tricky problem for both patients and urologists, even though over 90% patients can recover 12 months after operation. Many urologists are trying to improve the surgery, but these new technics mainly help locally advanced prostate cancer by better preservi...
Early urinary incontinence has always been a tricky problem for both patients and urologists, even though over 90% patients can recover 12 months after operation. Many urologists are trying to improve the surgery, but these new technics mainly help locally advanced prostate cancer by better preserving Neurovascular Bundles, urethra, external sphincter or other periurethral supporting structures. Sustainable functional urethral reconstruction (SFUR) is a novel technic which can improve early urinary incontinence for both locally and locally advanced prostate cancer, and even for those with high volume prostate by providing adequate urethral length with bladder neck tubularization and sustainable periurethral support with peritoneal flap. The purpose of this study is to compare early continence recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after RARP with or without this new technic.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT04037800
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Study Chair: Yinghao Sun, MD, PHD Changhai Hospital
Get Well Soon