Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With OCD

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

This study aims to investigate clinical, neurocognitive and neuroimaging variables associated with response to conventional treatments in adults with OCD. Study design: 0-52 weeks: open-label trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (preferably sertraline - easily available in the pu...

This study aims to investigate clinical, neurocognitive and neuroimaging variables associated with response to conventional treatments in adults with OCD. Study design: 0-52 weeks: open-label trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (preferably sertraline - easily available in the public network, usually well tolerated) up to the maximum recommended or tolerated dose (e.g., titration: start with 50mg/day, then add 50mg/day per week up to 200mg/day, if sertraline); patients who prefer to be treated with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) will be given this option whenever CBT is available. treatment will be delivered under naturalistic conditions, tailored according to the needs, preference, and availability. Subjects will be called up for follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline assessments. The instruments to be used at follow-up are the YBOCS and CGI scales. Response criteria: the definitions of a recent international expert consensus will be adopted (Mataix-Cols. et al., 2016). A positive response will be considered as at least 35% reduction in baseline Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores plus a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) rating of 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved"), lasting for at least one week. We will also rate the CGI - severity. Partial response will correspond to a greater than 25% but less than 35% reduction in Y-BOCS scores plus a CGI-I rating of at least 3 ("minimally improved"), lasting for at least one week. Subjects: • All participants assessed for clinical, neurocognitive and neuroimaging data in the global brain signatures study who are willing to receive evidence-based treatment for OCD. Assessments: Baseline: clinical, neurocognitive and neuroimaging protocols. Clinical: interviewer-delivered and self-report measures to determine: socio-demographic data, past medical history, psychiatric family history, psychiatric diagnoses, OCD symptom dimensions, the severity of OCD, insight into OCD, sensory phenomena, the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, severity of compulsive-impulsive behaviors, level of disability Neurocognitive: executive function, emotional regulation, memory Neuroimaging: structural MRI, resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Months 3, 6, 9 and 12: YBOCS checklist and past week severity; CGI - improvement subscale, relative to baseline; CGI - severity subscale; assessments can be in person or by phone, by the same independent evaluator at the different time points 1 year: treatment history form, YBOCS severity and checklist, Impulsive-Compulsive Behaviors Checklist (ICBC), Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), CGI. Hypotheses (built from the literature): the following variables (as assessed at baseline) will show an association with response to treatment: Clinical: duration of untreated illness (Alarcon et al., 1993; Ravizza et al., 1995; Stein et al., 2001); comorbidity: presence of comorbid social anxiety disorder (Carrasco et al., 1992), depressive disorders (Jakubovski et al., 2013); Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (Shavitt et al., 2010); level of insight (Erzegovesi et al., 2001); symptom dimension: presence and severity of symmetry, contamination and hoarding dimensions (Alarcon et al., 1993; Ferrão et al., 2006; Mataix-Cols et al., 1999; Hazari et al., 2016) Neurocognitive: decision making, verbal IQ (D'Alcante et al., 2012), verbal memory/learning (D'Alcante et al., 2012), inhibitory control and mental flexibility tasks (Flessner et al., 2010; Hazari et al., 2016). Neuroimaging: I. Structural: brain volumes in the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, striatum, dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (Yun et al., 2015), insula (Yun et al., 2015), thalamus, hippocampus, pituitary gland (Atmaca et al., 2016), amygdala (Szeszko et al., 2004), and cerebellum. II. Structural connectivity (Diffusion Tensor Imaging - DTI): fractional anisotropy measures in the corpus callosum, the internal capsule, white matter in the area superolateral to the right caudate, bilateral cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (Cannistraro et al., 2007; Szeszko wt al., 2005; Yoo et al., 2007; Garibotto et al., 2010). III. Functional connectivity (rs-fMRI): patterns of activation and connectivity in frontal-striatal (central executive), parietal, occipital, cerebellar, and insula-limbic (saliency) networks (Shin et al., 2014; Bhikram et al., 2016; Nakao et al., 2005; Sanematsu et al., 2010) IV. Exploratory: multimodal analyses of prediction Analyses plan: parametric and non-parametric tests will be employed as indicated.

Tracking Information