Transseptal vs Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Recruiting
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- Neurocognitive Dysfunction
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)Primary Purpose: Prevention
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 18 years and 125 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) controlled comparative effectiveness trial of a transseptal approach to left ventricular ablation compared to a retrograde aortic approach to prevent cerebral emboli and neurocognitive decline in adults with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/...
This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1) controlled comparative effectiveness trial of a transseptal approach to left ventricular ablation compared to a retrograde aortic approach to prevent cerebral emboli and neurocognitive decline in adults with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Participants will be followed for 6 months post-study procedure. This study will be conducted at up to 12 clinical sites in the United States. A total of one-hundred and fifty (150) participants will be enrolled and randomized.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT03946072
- Collaborators
- Not Provided
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gregory Marcus, MD University of California, San Francisco
Get Well Soon