Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
100

Summary

Conditions
  • Astrocytoma
  • Ependymoma
  • Ganglioglioma
  • Glioma
  • Oligodendroglioma
  • Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma
Type
Observational
Design
Observational Model: CohortTime Perspective: Prospective

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Part 1: Primary Objectives 1. To describe the social determinants of health in a cross-section of patients with WHO Grade 2-4 gliomas using a group of validated instruments including the PRAPARE instrument, the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool (AHC HRSN), and...

Part 1: Primary Objectives 1. To describe the social determinants of health in a cross-section of patients with WHO Grade 2-4 gliomas using a group of validated instruments including the PRAPARE instrument, the Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool (AHC HRSN), and supplementary questions. Secondary Objectives To compare social determinants of health between patients residing in economically disadvantaged and advantaged communities as defined in our prior study (low income communities vs high income county communities, by zip code). To compare social determinants of health between patients residing in economically disadvantaged and advantaged communities as defined by other means including county (low income communities vs high income communities, by county), by urban vs rural (urban vs rural, by city), and by area deprivation index (see Section 5.2). To quantify and compare the patient- and community-level social determinants of health present in the cohort and by community (low income community vs high income community). To compare the time to presentation, time to treatment initiation, and extent of surgery for patients from economically disadvantaged and advantaged communities as described above. Part 2: Data from our preliminary study revealed differences in survival for patients from low income communities compared to high income community zip codes. The overarching goal of Part 2 is to further characterize the social factors that characterize low income community and high income communities and may contribute to the differences in outcome. Primary Aim To identify, compare, contrast, and contextualize the patient- and community-specific social determinants for patients residing in (1) low income communities and high income community zip codes and (2) urban and rural communities. To explore how patients perceive communication with their providers about social and community factors that contribute to health outcomes and understand the barriers, challenges, and opportunities to improve patient-provider communication.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03900689
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Roy E. Strowd, III, MD Wake Forest University Health Sciences