Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
112

Summary

Conditions
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Crossover AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Randomized controlled trial with two arms, the experimental arm (Rehabilitation Planning Consult; RPC) and a wait list control (WLC) arm.Masking: Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: The outcomes assessor, study investigators, and statistician will remain blinded to group allocation. Participants and the treating therapist (Rehabilitation Consultant) will remain unblinded.Primary Purpose: Supportive Care

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) often have significant impairments, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life (QL). Rehabilitation services, such as speech-language pathology to improve swallowing, physiotherapy to improve neck mobility, and occupational therapy to enable return to...

Survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) often have significant impairments, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life (QL). Rehabilitation services, such as speech-language pathology to improve swallowing, physiotherapy to improve neck mobility, and occupational therapy to enable return to work, can effectively reduce the impact of impairments, restore function, and improve QL. However, access to rehabilitation for survivors of HNC is extremely limited. A trans-professional self-management program is needed to provide resources, links to community providers, and instruction in problem-solving strategies. The program should fit seamlessly into the cancer care system with minimal additional resources. To meet these specifications, an innovative intervention, the Rehabilitation Planning Consult (RPC), was developed and evaluated. The RPC is delivered in 1 to 2 sessions and, in a single arm pilot study, had a moderate to large effect on several aspects of QL and individualized goal attainment. It remains unknown whether the RPC is efficacious in comparison to standard care. In preparation for a Phase III trial, the effect of the RPC, as compared to a standard care control will be estimated, on HNC survivors' QL, attainment of individualized goals, and self-efficacy related to self-management. To facilitate recruitment and ensure ethical provision of services, participants will be randomized to a waiting list control (WLC) or RPC. Assessments will be conducted at three time points for the RPC group and four times for the WLC group. Based on pilot data, approximately 43% of the RPC group are expected to achieve a minimal important difference (MID) in QL, thus 56 participants per arm, 112 participants total, will be recruited. The primary outcome will be QL related to physical health, measured using the SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score (PCS). Secondary measures will include individualized goal performance measured using the Brief Rehabilitation Assessment for Survivors of HNC, disease-specific QL measured with the FACT-HN, and self-efficacy.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03672799
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Jolie Ringash, MD Princess Margaret Cancer Centre