Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentIntervention Model Description: This is an adaptive sequential trial of FM patients. In stage 1 patients were randomly allocated into two parallel arms (rTMS high dose, sham) using adaptive methodology. In stage 2, after the end of the first trial, patients will be allocated to two arms (low dose rTMS, high dose rTMS). Both stages will be conducted in a sequential methodology where an interim analysis will take place and indicate whether will take place trial is positive and of the scientific board agrees open its start. Recruitment time will be extended by 12 months due to dropouts related to the Covid pandemic. We have had dropouts due to a few patients developing covid and also due to patients having fear to become infected while attending hospital visitsMasking: Double (Participant, Investigator)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 80 years
Gender
Only males

Description

There are currently several points concerning rTMS for pain relief that have a huge impact in the practical application of rTMS in clinical practice, but which have not been approached by previous studies. One of them refers to dosing of the treatment. rTMS sessions have been proposed to comprise fr...

There are currently several points concerning rTMS for pain relief that have a huge impact in the practical application of rTMS in clinical practice, but which have not been approached by previous studies. One of them refers to dosing of the treatment. rTMS sessions have been proposed to comprise from 1000 to 3000 pulses of stimulation in each session, which means that treatment sessions may last from 7 to 20 minutes. While there are positive studies reporting different numbers of pulses, the actual stimulation protocol chosen may impact not only the efficacy of the treatment, but also the duration of the stimulation session, the time patients stay at the health-care facility, and, thus, cost and compliance to treatment. Also, an even more important issue is the frequency of the sessions in each treatment protocol. The idea of performing stimulation in chronic pain patients on a consecutive daily basis for long-term treatments seem unrealistic and potentially costly. However, it has been reported in animals, healthy subjects and FM patients that the analgesic effects of rTMS can outlast the stimulation session for several minutes and even days. This has led to the proposal that pain treatment with rTMS could be performed in consecutive daily induction sessions, followed by spaced (weekly, fortnightly and even monthly) maintenance sessions. This approach is similar to what is performed routinely in patients with major depression treated by rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and has successfully been tested in FM patients in a single- center study. Should this approach prove effective in larger prospective multicentric studies, rTMS could enter the armamentarium of non-invasive, non- pharmacological, low-adverse event therapeutic options to relieve fibromyalgia- related pain and associate symptoms. Hence, our aim is to conduct a multicentric international clinical trial on the influence of rTMS in the control of pain in a consecutive adaptive trial design where real rTMS of two different doses (1500 vs 3000 pulses per session) will be studied. Stimulations will be performed in a clinical practice-friendly approach, where daily maintenance sessions will be followed by weekly, and fortnightly stimulation sessions. There have been very scarce adaptive trials in the pain and non-invasive stimulation fields. This methodological approach allows for the use of lower number of patients in consecutive trials and, among other qualities, it allows for the imputation of data from the first trial into the second one, thus decreasing the duration of the studies and the number of participants. Similarly, this technical approach allows for pre-planned interim analyses to be performed during data collection, allowing for the sample size to be readjusted during the trial, and, more importantly, allowing for trial termination due to futility or due to achievement of the primary endpoint before the end of the original preplanned data collection period, with lower risk of bias. Here, the adaptive approach will allow one not only to compare high-dose rTMS to sham stimulation, but also, on second consecutive study, it will provide the first head-to-head study on rTMS to date comparing the analgesic effects of high and low dose rTMS.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03658694
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, MD, PhD Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil