Real World Effectiveness and Safety of Hysteroscopic (Essure®) Compared to Laparoscopic Sterilization

Summary

Participation Requirements

Description

Study Aims: Aim 1. To compare the real world effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization, laparoscopic sterilization and intrauterine devices (IUDs) by calculating: Pregnancy rates at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-procedure, indicating sterilization failure. Patient's ability to rely on ...

Study Aims: Aim 1. To compare the real world effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization, laparoscopic sterilization and intrauterine devices (IUDs) by calculating: Pregnancy rates at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-procedure, indicating sterilization failure. Patient's ability to rely on sterilization after hysteroscopic sterilization (blocked tubes on hysterosalpingogram) compared to laparoscopic sterilization and IUDs at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-procedure, indicating concern of sterilization failure. Aim 2. To compare safety and complications after hysteroscopic sterilization laparoscopic sterilization, and IUD placement by: Evaluating rates of reoperation to achieve sterilization or reinsertion to achieve IUD placement at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-procedure. Evaluating other outcomes suggested by patient partners, including additional surgeries due to complications, chronic pain, and/or depression, by measuring claims for narcotic prescriptions, and antidepressants at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months post-procedure (hysteroscopic sterilization, laparoscopic sterilization, or IUD placement). Identify sociodemographic and pre-sterilization clinical variables which may predict complications following hysteroscopic sterilization compared to laparoscopic sterilization and to IUDs.

Tracking Information