Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
ADHD
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Crossover AssignmentIntervention Model Description: Patients will be recruited from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Lund and Malmö. Typically developing children (TDC) and inattentive children without diagnosis will be recruited from schools. All participants will perform a double-blind placebo cross over control study. ADHD participants will perform the entire test battery at three occasions with 2-3 weeks intermission in between tests. One occasion with placebo medication and sham SVS stimulation; one occasion with active SVS stimulation; and one occasion with active medication. TD children will only be tested twice and just perform under SVS vs. sham conditions. Test battery: 1) Episodic memory will be tested trough Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) (e.g. Dige et al., 2008). 2) Visuo-spatial working memory will be tested through the Spanboard task (Westerberg et al., 2004). 3) Motor-neurological investigation. 4) A finger tapping task. 5) Evaluation of an iPhone auditory noise application in a normal school setting.Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)Masking Description: Participants will be randomized to placebo or stimulant medication during assessments. Participants will be unaware if they will get sham stimulation or SVS (but not the test administrator).Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 9 years and 18 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most frequent childhood disorders with an estimated prevalence of about 5-7% (e.g. Ullebo et al., 2012). Today the most common treatment approach is stimulant medication, e.g. methylphenidate (Greenhill et al., 2002; Wigal et al., 2011). ...

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most frequent childhood disorders with an estimated prevalence of about 5-7% (e.g. Ullebo et al., 2012). Today the most common treatment approach is stimulant medication, e.g. methylphenidate (Greenhill et al., 2002; Wigal et al., 2011). However there are many concerns about medication: i) best dose for cognitive functioning and adapted school behavior differs (Hale et al., 2011), ii) it is not even evident that medication improves learning processes (Molina et al., 2009), iii) concerns regarding potential for drug abuse (Gordon et al., 2004); and iv) uncertainties regarding long term effects of drug use on the developing brain (Andersen, 2005). In both national and international guidelines of ADHD care multimodal treatment is recommended (Young & Amarasinghe, 2010), but most patients only receive pharmacological treatment, sometimes in combination with parent training. If auditory or vestibular noise, as the present project suggests, could be a complement or an alternative to stimulant medication it could fundamentally change the treatment of ADHD and the school situation for those children. Noise benefit in ADHD Auditory noise benefit: The original findings from our research group, that auditory noise enhances cognitive performance in inattentive children without diagnosis as well as children with an ADHD diagnosis, have been replicated several times (Baijot et al., 2016; Söderlund et al., 2016; Söderlund & Nilsson Jobs, 2016; Söderlund et al., 2007). In a new study, the benefit of noise was shown to be in parity with or even larger than the benefit of pharmacological ADHD treatment on two cognitive tasks, episodic word recall and visuo-spatial working memory task. In the study a group of children diagnosed with ADHD were tested on and off medication, at separate occasions, in noisy vs. silent environments while performing the tasks (Söderlund, Björk et al., 2016). Inattentive and low achieving school children have been shown to improve their memory recall when exposed to noise, whereas attentive and high achieving children perform worse during noise exposure (Helps et al., 2014; Söderlund & Sikström, 2008, 2012; Söderlund et al., 2010). Vestibular noise benefit: Vestibular stimulation has since long been demonstrated to increase hippocampal activity and hippocampus is well demonstrated to be of crucial importance in detecting and holding on to spatial targets showing that hippocampus is of fundamental for both spatial orientation and learning in general (Moser et al., 2015). Therefore it is not surprising that external stochastic vestibular stimulation (SVS) exerts beneficial effects in different domains, e.g. balance in healthy astronauts (Mulavara et al., 2011), in Parkinson patients (Pal et al., 2009; Samoudi et al., 2014) and response times in continuous performance task (Yamamoto et al., 2005). The theory about noise benefit is thoroughly described by Sikström and Söderlund (2007). 1. The first objective is to systematically evaluate the effects of stochastic vestibular noise on cognitive task performance and to compare these results with the ones of stimulant medication using a double blind RCT (Random Control Trial) design. The second objective is to implement a practical application, to evaluate if auditory noise can be beneficial in an every day school setting by the use of an iPhone application (see: www.smartnoise.se). Participants and recruitment: Participants with an ADHD diagnosis using medication will be recruited from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Lund and Malmö. Typically developing children (TDC) and inattentive children without diagnosis will be recruited from schools in collaboration with the municipality. Experimental design: All participants will perform a double-blind placebo cross over control study. ADHD participants will perform the entire test battery at three occasions with 2-3 weeks intermission in between tests. One occasion with placebo medication and sham SVS stimulation; one occasion with active SVS stimulation; and one occasion with active medication. TD children will only be tested twice while they will not be given any medication or placebo and just perform under SVS vs. sham conditions. Test battery: 1) Episodic memory will be tested trough Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) (e.g. Dige et al., 2008). 2) Visuo-spatial working memory will be tested through the Spanboard task (Westerberg et al., 2004). 3) Motor-neurological investigation. 4) A finger tapping task. 5) Evaluation of an iPhone auditory noise application in a normal school setting. Our research group has developed an iPhone application (www.smartnoise.se) that is available at App-store right now. The study will last for about 5 months and participants will be 50 voluntary secondary school pupils that have documented attention difficulties as judged by their teachers. The application will be evaluated both by pupils, teachers and parents.

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03425669
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Peik Gustafsson, MD, PhD Department of clinical sciences, Lund Uniersity