A Prospective Study of Treating Duodenal Papillary Sphincter in Different Ways During ERCP
Last updated on July 2021Recruitment
- Recruitment Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Estimated Enrollment
- Same as current
Summary
- Conditions
- ERCP
- Type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Design
- Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: Single (Participant)Primary Purpose: Treatment
Participation Requirements
- Age
- Between 20 years and 80 years
- Gender
- Both males and females
Description
Investigators first divided the patients with different sizes of common bile duct stones into two groups. The bile duct stone diameter of group A is less than 1.0cm while group B is more than 1.0cm and less than 1.5cm. Each group compared Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), endoscopic papillary balloon...
Investigators first divided the patients with different sizes of common bile duct stones into two groups. The bile duct stone diameter of group A is less than 1.0cm while group B is more than 1.0cm and less than 1.5cm. Each group compared Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), and endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation (sEST+EPBD) in ERCP. Through the postoperative comparison of relevant inspection test indicators, the recovery of patients, whether the occurrence of complications, including infection,bleeding,pancreatitis,perforation , and 1 year stone recurrence rate,Investigators assess the advantages and disadvantages in three different strategies in different sizes of common bile duct stones , and finally get a relatively objective evaluation to guide our daily ERCP work on the choice of duodenal papillary sphincter treatment strategy.
Tracking Information
- NCT #
- NCT03416205
- Collaborators
- Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
- Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Changhui Yu, Doctor Zhujiang Hospital