Recruitment

Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Estimated Enrollment
Same as current

Summary

Conditions
Spinal Cord Injuries
Type
Interventional
Phase
Not Applicable
Design
Allocation: RandomizedIntervention Model: Parallel AssignmentMasking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment

Participation Requirements

Age
Between 18 years and 125 years
Gender
Both males and females

Description

Experimental Design The investigators will enroll, implant and complete the interventions in 36 research participants who have sustained a SCI in the proposed experiments. The investigators anticipate they will need to screen 108 potential research participants to enroll 36 individuals who will comp...

Experimental Design The investigators will enroll, implant and complete the interventions in 36 research participants who have sustained a SCI in the proposed experiments. The investigators anticipate they will need to screen 108 potential research participants to enroll 36 individuals who will complete the study. This sample size will provide sufficient replication per study group (n=4) from which variance and effect size estimates for each study hypothesis can be calculated, and hypothesis tests conducted. The investigators will also select individuals to assure that there are a minimum of 25% (n=9) women to adequately represent the percentage in the SCI population. The investigators will study each cohort of patients comprehensively, and each individual will be allocated to the group interventions based on the method of minimization. Research participants will be randomized into group interventions. This novel approach of conducting repeated experiments with comprehensive assessments in a smaller cohort of patients, rather than a more traditional approach of including a large number of patients and focusing on a single outcome, will advance both clinical and scientific knowledge in this highly complex population. The investigators have found success with the smaller cohort approach because they can employ more rigorous, quantitative and sensitive outcomes that not only inform them about the potential clinical efficacy, but also provide further knowledge of the mechanisms of neural control of movement and other physiological mechanisms related to cardiovascular, respiratory, bladder, bowel and sexual function. Group A: Vol-scES during voluntary leg movement training while sitting or lying supine (A1). CV-scES during sitting or lying supine (A2). Group B: Vol-scES during voluntary leg movement training + Stand-ES during stand training (B1). CV-ES during sitting or lying supine + Stand-ES during stand training (B2).

Tracking Information

NCT #
NCT03364660
Collaborators
Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Susan J Harkema, PhD University of Louisville